From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA212C0077 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:32:40 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:32:28 -0500 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/MPIC: Add get_version API both for internal and external use To: Jia Hongtao References: <1365386514-14647-1-git-send-email-hongtao.jia@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <1365386514-14647-1-git-send-email-hongtao.jia@freescale.com> (from hongtao.jia@freescale.com on Sun Apr 7 21:01:54 2013) Message-ID: <1365561148.29365.0@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Cc: hongtao.jia@freescale.com, B07421@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 04/07/2013 09:01:54 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote: > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c > index d30e6a6..48c8fae 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c > @@ -1165,10 +1165,30 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops mpic_host_ops =3D { > .xlate =3D mpic_host_xlate, > }; >=20 > +static u32 fsl_mpic_get_version(struct mpic *mpic) > +{ > + u32 brr1; > + > + brr1 =3D _mpic_read(mpic->reg_type, &mpic->thiscpuregs, > + MPIC_FSL_BRR1); > + > + return brr1 & MPIC_FSL_BRR1_VER; > +} If it's not an FSL mpic, thiscpuregs->base will be NULL. Please check =20 mpic->flags for MPIC_FSL. > + > /* > * Exported functions > */ >=20 > +u32 fsl_mpic_primary_get_version(void) > +{ > + struct mpic *mpic =3D mpic_primary; > + > + if (mpic) > + return fsl_mpic_get_version(mpic); > + > + return 0; > +} ...especially since the external version doesn't check for it either. Otherwise, this and the MSI-X patch look OK to me. -Scott=