From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7D12C015F for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:40:25 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1366677610.2886.8.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/rtas_flash: New return code to indicate FW entitlement expiry From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Vasant Hegde Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:40:10 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20130419114410.19115.35846.stgit@hegdevasant> References: <20130419114410.19115.35846.stgit@hegdevasant> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 17:14 +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote: > Add new return code to rtas_flash to indicate firmware entitlement > expiry. This will be used by the update_flash script to return > appropriate message to the user. What's the point of that patch ? It adds a definition to a private .c file not exposed to user space and doesn't do anything with it ... Ben. > Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli > Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c > index a7020d2..0a12c16 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ > #define VALIDATE_TMP_COMMIT_DL 4 /* Validate Return Status */ > #define VALIDATE_TMP_COMMIT 5 /* Validate Return Status */ > #define VALIDATE_TMP_UPDATE_DL 6 /* Validate Return Status */ > +#define VALIDATE_OUT_OF_WRNTY 7 /* Validate Return Status */ > > /* ibm,manage-flash-image operation tokens */ > #define RTAS_REJECT_TMP_IMG 0