From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <klebers@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] Speed Cap fixes for ppc64
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 09:01:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367622108.4389.129.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367620993-27037-1-git-send-email-klebers@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 19:43 -0300, Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> This patch series does:
> 1. max_bus_speed is used to set the device to gen2 speeds
> 2. on power there's no longer a conflict between the pseries call and other
> architectures, because the overwrite is done via a ppc_md hook
> 3. radeon is using bus->max_bus_speed instead of drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask
> for gen2 capability detection
>
> The first patch consists of some architecture changes, such as adding a hook on
> powerpc for pci_root_bridge_prepare, so that pseries will initialize it to a
> function, while all other architectures get a NULL pointer. So that whenever
> pci_create_root_bus is called, we'll get max_bus_speed properly setup from
> OpenFirmware.
>
> The second patch consists of simple radeon changes not to call
> drm_get_pcie_speed_cap_mask anymore. I assume that on x86 machines,
> the max_bus_speed property will be properly set already.
So I'm ok with the approach now and I might even put the powerpc patch
in for 3.10 since arguably we are fixing a nasty bug (uninitialized
max_bus_speed).
David, what's your feeling about the radeon change ? It would be nice if
that could go in soon for various distro targets :-) On the other hand
I'm not going to be pushy if you are not comfortable with it.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-03 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-03 22:43 [PATCHv5 0/2] Speed Cap fixes for ppc64 Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
2013-05-03 22:43 ` [PATCHv5 1/2] ppc64: perform proper max_bus_speed detection Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
2013-05-03 22:43 ` [PATCHv5 2/2] radeon: use max_bus_speed to activate gen2 speeds Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
2013-05-03 23:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2013-05-06 14:32 ` [PATCHv5 0/2] Speed Cap fixes for ppc64 Alex Deucher
2013-05-06 14:33 ` Jerome Glisse
2013-05-15 12:35 ` Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
2013-05-15 12:58 ` Alex Deucher
2013-05-15 13:12 ` Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367622108.4389.129.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=klebers@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).