From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F6E52C008A for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 17:05:41 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1370588727.3766.355.camel@pasglop> Subject: FSL 64-bit DMA window question From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Zang Roy-R61911 Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:05:27 +1000 In-Reply-To: <3E027F8168735B46AC006B1D0C7BB0020B2135A0@039-SN2MPN1-012.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <1368679657.9603.32.camel@pasglop> <1368683156.9603.34.camel@pasglop> <6A3DF150A5B70D4F9B66A25E3F7C888D0701C307@039-SN2MPN1-012.039d.mgd.msft.net> <3E027F8168735B46AC006B1D0C7BB0020B1E040F@039-SN2MPN1-011.039d.mgd.msft.net> <1368684547.9603.38.camel@pasglop> <51947A00.9010504@windriver.com> <1368685307.9603.39.camel@pasglop> <51947E35.30808@windriver.com> <1368686426.9603.49.camel@pasglop> <5194800D.3010606@windriver.com> <6A3DF150A5B70D4F9B66A25E3F7C888D0701C498@039-SN2MPN1-012.039d.mgd.msft.net> <1368687133.9603.51.camel@pasglop> <1370577138.3766.342.camel@pasglop> <1370579976.3766.345.camel@pasglop> <3E027F8168735B46AC006B1D0C7BB0020B2135A0@039-SN2MPN1-012.039d.mgd.msft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Xie Shaohui-B21989 , Liu Qiang-B32616 , Timur Tabi , "tiejun.chen" , Fleming Andy-AFLEMING , Bhushan Bharat-R65777 , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Folks ! Is there any specific reason why you chose 1T (40 bit) as the location of the 64-bit DMA window ? It happens that most current radeon adapters cannot DMA there, they have a 40-bit DMA limit. I seem to be getting things to work fine using a 39-bit window, but I suppose that might collide with something else ? Can you guys consider changing the default ? Cheers, Ben.