From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Lian Minghuan-b31939 <B31939@freescale.com>
Cc: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Zang Roy-R61911 <r61911@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/dts: update MSI bindings doc for MPIC v4.3
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:28:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371515287.9073.15@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BE999D.2080207@freescale.com> (from B31939@freescale.com on Mon Jun 17 00:07:41 2013)
On 06/17/2013 12:07:41 AM, Lian Minghuan-b31939 wrote:
> Hi Soctt,
>=20
> please see my comments.
>=20
> On 06/15/2013 06:06 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 06/14/2013 02:15:57 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote:
>>> Add compatible "fsl,mpic-msi-v4.3" for MPIC v4.3. MPIC v4.3 contains
>>> MSIIR and MSIIR1. MSIIR supports 8 MSI registers and MSIIR1 supports
>>> 16 MSI registers, but uses different IBS and SRS shift. When using
>>> MSIR1, the interrupt number is not consecutive. It is hard to use
>>> 'msi-available-ranges' to describe the ranges of the available
>>> interrupt and the ranges are related to the application, rather than
>>> the description of the hardware. this patch also removes
>>> 'msi-available-ranges' property.
>>>=20
>>> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/msi-pic.txt | 49 =20
>>> ++++++++++------------
>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>=20
>>> diff --git =20
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/msi-pic.txt =20
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/msi-pic.txt
>>> index 5693877..e851e93 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/msi-pic.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/msi-pic.txt
>>> @@ -1,26 +1,23 @@
>>> * Freescale MSI interrupt controller
>>>=20
>>> Required properties:
>>> -- compatible : compatible list, contains 2 entries,
>>> +- compatible : compatible list, may contains one or two entries,
>>> first is "fsl,CHIP-msi", where CHIP is the processor(mpc8610, =20
>>> mpc8572,
>>> - etc.) and the second is "fsl,mpic-msi" or "fsl,ipic-msi" =20
>>> depending on
>>> - the parent type.
>>> + etc.) and the second is "fsl,mpic-msi" or "fsl,ipic-msi" or
>>> + "fsl,mpic-msi-v4.3" depending on the parent type and version. If =20
>>> mpic
>>> + version is 4.3, the number of MSI registers is increased to 16, =20
>>> MSIIR1 is
>>> + provided to access these 16 registers, compatible =20
>>> "fsl,mpic-msi-v4.3"
>>> + should be used.
>>=20
>> Why "one or two"? What does it look like in the case where there's =20
>> just one?
>>=20
> [Minghuan] The original doc said 'contains 2 entries', but I notcie =20
> pq3-mpic.dtsi and qoriq-mpic.dtsi have only one entry "fsl,mpic-msi", =20
> do not have "fsl,CHIP-msi".
> for example:
> mpc8610_hpcd.dts: compatible =3D "fsl,mpc8610-msi", "fsl,mpic-msi";
> fsl/qoriq-mpic.dtsi: compatible =3D "fsl,mpic-msi"
>=20
> Maybe I should say " For some platforms, "fsl,CHIP-msi' is optional."
Well, this is more a matter of some device trees not complying with the =20
binding, rather than an update for MPIC v4.3.
In any case, if the plan is to update the binding to match what we've =20
been doing in the actual trees, at least word it so that it's clear =20
which one of the two is optional.
>> Why are you removing msi-available-ranges? It's not valid for MPIC =20
>> v4.3, but it's still valid for older MPICs. It should move to the =20
>> optional section, though.
> [Minghuan] Because I would like to add kernel parameter 'msiregs' =20
> instead of "msi-available-ranges", for all the MPICs, we will have a =20
> uniform way to configure
I've responded elsewhere to this, but I'd also like to add that we =20
don't break compatibility with older device tree bindings just for "a =20
uniform way".
>>> Example:
>>> msi@41600 {
>>> - compatible =3D "fsl,mpc8610-msi", "fsl,mpic-msi";
>>> - reg =3D <0x41600 0x80>;
>>> - msi-available-ranges =3D <0 0x100>;
>>> - interrupts =3D <
>>> - 0xe0 0
>>> - 0xe1 0
>>> - 0xe2 0
>>> - 0xe3 0
>>> - 0xe4 0
>>> - 0xe5 0
>>> - 0xe6 0
>>> - 0xe7 0>;
>>> - interrupt-parent =3D <&mpic>;
>>> - };
>>> + compatible =3D "fsl,mpic-msi";
>>> + reg =3D <0x41600 0x200 0x44140 4>;
>>=20
>> Why 0x200?
>>=20
> [Minghuan] The offsets of the MSIA registers are from 0x41600 to =20
> 0x417ff, and the size is 0x200.
> offset 0x41600-0x4170 are MSIIRA1-7.
> 0x41720 is MSISRA,
> 0x41750 is MSIIR.
> The others are reserved.
There is no MSIIRA on fsl,mpic-msi.
If you want to show an fsl,mpic-msi-v4.3 example, update the compatible =20
and add the extra 8 interrupts. We should probably show an example of =20
each.
BTW, why are you changing/breaking the whitespace in the example?
-Scott=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 7:15 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/dts: add MPIC v4.3 dts node Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/fsl_msi: add MSIIR1 support for MPIC v4.3 Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:09 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 3:00 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 2:34 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 18:08 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/dts: update MSI bindings doc " Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:06 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:07 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:28 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-06-18 0:42 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 2:49 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 16:21 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/dts: remove msi-available-ranges property Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:15 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/fsl_msi: add 'msiregs' kernel parameter Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:36 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:18 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 3:10 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 16:22 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 20:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/dts: add MPIC v4.3 dts node Scott Wood
2013-06-14 21:53 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 2:23 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:18 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1371515287.9073.15@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=B31939@freescale.com \
--cc=Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=r61911@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).