From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com (e9.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e9.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354512C00A7 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:38:20 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e9.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:38:17 -0400 Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CC138C8045 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:38:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r5Q1cE9m56885438 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:38:14 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r5Q1cDhS021032 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:38:13 -0300 From: Gavin Shan To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/eeh: Don't collect PCI-CFG data on PHB Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:38:03 +0800 Message-Id: <1372210688-12214-2-git-send-email-shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1372210688-12214-1-git-send-email-shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1372210688-12214-1-git-send-email-shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Gavin Shan List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , When the PHB is fenced or dead, it's pointless to collect the data from PCI config space of subordinate PCI devices since it should return 0xFF's. The patch also fixes overwritten buffer while getting PCI config data. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c index 951a632..2dd0bd1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c @@ -232,16 +232,30 @@ void eeh_slot_error_detail(struct eeh_pe *pe, int severity) { size_t loglen = 0; struct eeh_dev *edev; + bool valid_cfg_log = true; - eeh_pci_enable(pe, EEH_OPT_THAW_MMIO); - eeh_ops->configure_bridge(pe); - eeh_pe_restore_bars(pe); - - pci_regs_buf[0] = 0; - eeh_pe_for_each_dev(pe, edev) { - loglen += eeh_gather_pci_data(edev, pci_regs_buf, - EEH_PCI_REGS_LOG_LEN); - } + /* + * When the PHB is fenced or dead, it's pointless to collect + * the data from PCI config space because it should return + * 0xFF's. For ER, we still retrieve the data from the PCI + * config space. + */ + if (eeh_probe_mode_dev() && + (pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB) && + (pe->state & (EEH_PE_ISOLATED | EEH_PE_PHB_DEAD))) + valid_cfg_log = false; + + if (valid_cfg_log) { + eeh_pci_enable(pe, EEH_OPT_THAW_MMIO); + eeh_ops->configure_bridge(pe); + eeh_pe_restore_bars(pe); + + pci_regs_buf[0] = 0; + eeh_pe_for_each_dev(pe, edev) { + loglen += eeh_gather_pci_data(edev, pci_regs_buf + loglen, + EEH_PCI_REGS_LOG_LEN - loglen); + } + } eeh_ops->get_log(pe, severity, pci_regs_buf, loglen); } -- 1.7.5.4