From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDB142C007C for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:56:50 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1372283780.18612.31.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the powerpc tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Oleg Nesterov Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:56:20 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20130626141916.GA30716@redhat.com> References: <20130626165642.8740ecb6d5d5882b06f173c8@canb.auug.org.au> <1372234231.18612.6.camel@pasglop> <20130626141916.GA30716@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Michael Neuling , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 16:19 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > You were cc'ed every time ;) > > > Why didn't it go through the powerpc tree ? > > Because this series needs to update any user of > ptrace_get/put_breakpoints > in arch/ (simply remove these calls), then change the core kernel > code, then > fix arch/86. That's fine. I didn't realize that was a series, thought it was a standalone patch I had missed. Ben.