From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (e23smtp09.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e23smtp09.au.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFFF42C02B8 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:42:34 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:38:13 +1000 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.120]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C874357804E for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:42:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r6B4RK0H721268 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:27:21 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r6B4gSSW020471 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:42:28 +1000 Message-ID: <1373517747.19894.54.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix the corrupt r3 error during MCE handling. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:42:27 +1000 In-Reply-To: <51DE35D5.5070005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20130710130155.4993.61577.stgit@mars> <8761wild20.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51DE35D5.5070005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev , Paul Mackerras , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 10:04 +0530, Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar wrote: > > I always got that error and used to wonder why I find FWNMI > > corrupt. IS this a rtas bug or is it documented in papr ? > > Nope. There is no mention of it in PAPR. It looks like a bug in RTAS. Typically, the top bit in real mode means to ignore the HRMOR... I think it's some old bug in RTAS indeed. Cheers, Ben.