linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: Zhao Chenhui <chenhui.zhao@freescale.com>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, r39252@freescale.com,
	AFLEMING@freescale.com, X.Xie@freescale.com,
	cbouatmailru@gmail.com, cjb@laptop.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Haijun Zhang <Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 V2] powerpc/85xx: Add support for 85xx cpu type detection
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:15:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373552117.8183.243@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B72DE@saturn3.aculab.com> (from David.Laight@ACULAB.COM on Thu Jul 11 03:43:35 2013)

On 07/11/2013 03:43:35 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > > +#define IS_SVR_REV(svr, maj, min) \
> > > +	((SVR_MAJ(svr) =3D=3D (maj)) && (SVR_MIN(svr) =3D=3D (min)))
> >
> > I don't think IS_SVR_REV is needed.  Callers can just do "if
> > (SVR_REV(svr) =3D=3D 0x30)" or whatever, especially since we're relying=
 =20
> on
> > them to do this for greater/less than comparisons.
>=20
> Not only that, I'd guess that 'maj' and 'min' are likely to be
> constants - so you'd want to combine them and compare against 'svr'
> rather than have two conditionals.

Yes, that's what I meant -- 0x30 would represent revision 3.0.

-Scott=

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-11 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-10  7:39 [PATCH 1/4 V2] powerpc/85xx: Add support for 85xx cpu type detection Haijun Zhang
2013-07-10 21:48 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-11  8:43   ` David Laight
2013-07-11  9:02     ` Zhang Haijun-B42677
2013-07-11 14:15     ` Scott Wood [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1373552117.8183.243@snotra \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=AFLEMING@freescale.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com \
    --cc=X.Xie@freescale.com \
    --cc=cbouatmailru@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenhui.zhao@freescale.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=r39252@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).