From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <aijazbaig1@gmail.com>
Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E626E2C0345
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:38:41 +1000 (EST)
Received: from tom.nabble.com ([192.168.236.105])
 by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
 (envelope-from <aijazbaig1@gmail.com>) id 1UxbgN-00025Z-2w
 for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 04:38:39 -0700
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 04:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: JiveTalkin <aijazbaig1@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Message-ID: <1373629119047-73669.post@n7.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1373464479578-73565.post@n7.nabble.com>
References: <1373464479578-73565.post@n7.nabble.com>
Subject: Re: ABI defined register usage within function calls
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Moderator..can you change the subject of this to "Understanding register
usage as per ABI rules for functions" ??

Additionally, doesn't anyone have anything to say about this?



--
View this message in context: http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/ABI-defined-register-usage-within-function-calls-tp73565p73669.html
Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.