From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE452C033F for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:05:49 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1373670339.19894.214.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/math-emu: keep track of the instructions unimplemented by FPU From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Scott Wood Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:05:39 +1000 In-Reply-To: <1373662399.8183.283@snotra> References: <1373546721.19894.90.camel@pasglop> <1373553002.8183.245@snotra> <20130712022512.GB32154@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com> <1373662399.8183.283@snotra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc , Kevin Hao List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 15:53 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > It's not redundant at all to warn when an FPU is absent. It tells you > that you're being slowed down by running hard-FP code instead of > soft-FP code. Right, just warn always. Ben.