From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 696932C0082 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 01:24:24 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:24:12 -0500 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 V2] mmc: esdhc: Correct host version of T4240-R1.0 To: Zang Roy-R61911 References: <1374055891-20703-1-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com> <1374055891-20703-2-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com> <1374081074.8183.360@snotra> <3E027F8168735B46AC006B1D0C7BB0020B27D1E9@039-SN2MPN1-012.039d.mgd.msft.net> In-Reply-To: <3E027F8168735B46AC006B1D0C7BB0020B27D1E9@039-SN2MPN1-012.039d.mgd.msft.net> (from r61911@freescale.com on Wed Jul 17 21:30:45 2013) Message-ID: <1374161052.5357.0@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Zhang Haijun-B42677 , Fleming Andy-AFLEMING , "cbouatmailru@gmail.com" , "cjb@laptop.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/17/2013 09:30:45 PM, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote: >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc- > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Scott Wood > > > > On 07/17/2013 05:11:30 AM, Haijun Zhang wrote: > > > Vender version and sdhc spec version of T4240-R1.0 is incorrect. > > > The right value should be VVN=3D0x13, SVN =3D 0x1. The wrong version > > > number will break down the ADMA data transfer. > > > This defect only exist in T4240-R1.0. Will be fixed in T4240-R2.0. > > > Also share vvn and svr for public use. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang > > > > We're not supporting T4240 rev 1.0 in upstream Linux, as it's not > > production silicon. > As discussed, production silicon Rev 2.0 will also suffer this issue. =20 > So need to address it beyond T4240-R2.0. OK -- please update the commit message. -Scott=