From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29E372C0090 for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 07:59:23 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1375480754.15999.42.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/crypto/nx: saves chaining value from co-processor From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Fionnuala Gunter Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 07:59:14 +1000 In-Reply-To: <1375480550.32477.19.camel@what-is-leg> References: <1375477090.32477.10.camel@what-is-leg> <1375477741.15999.23.camel@pasglop> <1375480550.32477.19.camel@what-is-leg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 16:55 -0500, Fionnuala Gunter wrote: > Sorry, I thought linuxppc-dev was the right tree since the patch is > for > a ppc driver and you've carried previous nx driver submissions > upstream. > > I want to submit to the proper place, so what is your preference? Well, that's the right place if you want me to merge it, which seems to be what Marcelo is also expecting... However I do wonder why is that expectation there in the first place and why aren't those handled by the crypto maintainer... Cheers, Ben.