From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5BB2C0173
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:10:06 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <1376428169.4255.16.camel@pasglop>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:09:29 +1000
In-Reply-To: <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan>
References: <5208E2D3.7060005@arm.com> <520A536C.3030600@arm.com>
 <CAL_JsqJdGXuTmb2kgBwgmRYGs9f92-dsawDXSXjmJW8cwjFVQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1974929.8mIZF44QnT@vostro.rjw.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
 "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>,
 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 "rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
 Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
 linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> I'd go for 1 above personally.

Yuck no. Two functions with roughly the same name and the same purpose
differing only by an underscore just because one can't take 5mn to
reconcile the new one with the old one ? No way.

Ben.