From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from db8outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db8lp0188.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2BC02C0246 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:11:35 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1380150683.24959.215.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc/85xx: use one kernel option for all the CoreNet_Generic boards From: Scott Wood To: Kevin Hao Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:11:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130925005843.GA20572@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com> References: <1379991797-29222-1-git-send-email-haokexin@gmail.com> <1379991797-29222-4-git-send-email-haokexin@gmail.com> <1380062492.24959.123.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <20130925005843.GA20572@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 08:58 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:41:32PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 11:03 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: > > > + and B4 QDS boards > [...] > > > > Is there any difference between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of this > > config symbol, other than the help text? > > No. As you know some of these boards only support 32bit kernel and some of > them only support 64bit kernel. It will definitely cause confusion when using > only one kernel option for all these boards. So I divide this into two options > (even the same name) for 32bit and 64bit respectively. You could just mention in the help text which boards are 32-bit, which are 64-bit, and which can work with either. -Scott