From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FDC62C00C3 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 07:11:48 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1380229898.24959.318.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl/defconfig: enable CONFIG_AT803X_PHY From: Scott Wood To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:11:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F35281021ADFACA@039-SN1MPN1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <1378196906-9850-1-git-send-email-Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com> <1380158651.24959.239.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F35281021ADFACA@039-SN1MPN1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 22:02 -0500, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:24 AM > > To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685 > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; galak@kernel.crashing.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl/defconfig: enable CONFIG_AT803X_PHY > > > > On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 16:28 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote: > > > Enable CONFIG_AT803X_PHY to support AR8030/8033/8035 PHY. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu > > > --- > > > arch/powerpc/configs/corenet32_smp_defconfig | 1 + > > > arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig | 1 + > > > arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig | 1 + > > > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > Why not corenet64_smp_defconfig? Which boards have this PHY? > > > > -Scott > > > Currently AT803X exists on P1010RDB, P1025TWR, etc. > It seems we don't use AT803X for those boards of corenet64. Neither of those boards are corenet32 either. -Scott