From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126212C0094 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:01:07 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1380232830.28561.71.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hvc_vio: Do not override preferred console set by kernel parameter From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:00:30 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20130926212254.GA12564@kroah.com> References: <1378052656.25743.33.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <1378079740.3978.13.camel@pasglop> <20130926212254.GA12564@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Bastian Blank , Jiri Slaby , Ben Hutchings , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Debian kernel maintainers List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 14:22 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > So, I shouldn't apply this patch? We should do something to fix this, > if Debian has to drag this patch on for 5 years, that's an indication > that this might be one solution we should use, right? Ah sorry, dropped the ball on that one. Yes the patch is an acceptable band-aid but somebody should work on a better solution :-) Cheers, Ben.