From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/kernel/sysfs: disable writing to purr in non-powernv
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:50:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380613830.645.18.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131001063129.GF17966@concordia>
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 16:31 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > 1)Changed the test for to hypervisor mode instead of platform
>
> I think Ben's wrong about that.
>
> Almost all existing code uses FW_FEATURE_LPAR to differentiate
> hypervisor vs guest mode, so I think we should do the same here.
I didn't object to using the FW test, it's a reasonable way to do it, I
objected to using the platform as an indication (powernv vs. pseries)
Ben.
> So it would be:
>
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> > + if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
> > + add_write_permission_dev_attr((void *)&dev_attr_purr);
> > device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_purr);
> > + }
>
>
> > +static void add_write_permission_dev_attr(void *ptr)
> > +{
> > + struct device_attribute *attr = (struct device_attribute *)ptr;
> > +
> > + attr->attr.mode |= (unsigned short) 0200;
> > +}
>
> Why does it take a void *, which then requires a cast at the call site?
>
> And do you need the cast to short? If so shouldn't you use umode_t
> directly?
>
> cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-01 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 11:33 [PATCH V2] powerpc/kernel/sysfs: disable writing to purr in non-powernv Madhavan Srinivasan
2013-10-01 6:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-01 7:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2013-10-01 8:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-01 8:09 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380613830.645.18.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).