From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Received: from webmail.solarflare.com (webmail.solarflare.com [12.187.104.25])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "WEBMAIL.SOLARFLARE.COM",
 Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Secure Server CA - G3" (not verified))
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE0042C00C6
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Fri,  4 Oct 2013 07:53:02 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <1380837174.3419.21.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 06/77] PCI/MSI: Factor out pci_get_msi_cap() interface
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:52:54 +0100
In-Reply-To: <9c282c4ab92731c719d161d2db6fc54ce33891d9.1380703262.git.agordeev@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1380703262.git.agordeev@redhat.com>
 <9c282c4ab92731c719d161d2db6fc54ce33891d9.1380703262.git.agordeev@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, "VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
 linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Andy King <acking@vmware.com>,
 linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
 iss_storagedev@hp.com, linux-driver@qlogic.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
 Jon Mason <jon.mason@intel.com>,
 Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com>,
 netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, linux390@de.ibm.com,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
[...]
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -812,6 +812,21 @@ static int pci_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int pci_get_msi_cap(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	u16 msgctl;
> +
> +	if (!dev->msi_cap)
> +		return -EINVAL;
[...]
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1144,6 +1144,11 @@ struct msix_entry {
>  
> 
>  #ifndef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> +static inline int pci_get_msi_cap(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	return -1;
[...]

Shouldn't this also return -EINVAL?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.