From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 3/6] book3e/kgdb: update thread's dbcr0
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:57:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382137030.7979.914.camel@snotra.buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371724110-8250-4-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 18:28 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> gdb always need to generate a single step properly to invoke
> a kgdb state. But with lazy interrupt, book3e can't always
> trigger a debug exception with a single step since the current
> is blocked for handling those pending exception, then we miss
> that expected dbcr configuration at last to generate a debug
> exception.
What do you mean by "the current is blocked"? Could you explain more
clearly what lazy EE has to do with MSR_DE and DBCR0?
> So here we also update thread's dbcr0 to make sure the current
> can go back with that missed dbcr0 configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> index c1eef24..55409ac 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int vector, int signo, int err_code,
> struct pt_regs *linux_regs)
> {
> char *ptr = &remcom_in_buffer[1];
> - unsigned long addr;
> + unsigned long addr, dbcr0;
>
> switch (remcom_in_buffer[0]) {
> /*
> @@ -427,8 +427,15 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int vector, int signo, int err_code,
> /* set the trace bit if we're stepping */
> if (remcom_in_buffer[0] == 's') {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS
> - mtspr(SPRN_DBCR0,
> - mfspr(SPRN_DBCR0) | DBCR0_IC | DBCR0_IDM);
> + dbcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_DBCR0) | DBCR0_IC | DBCR0_IDM;
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR0, dbcr0);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64
This could as well be "CONFIG_PPC64" -- CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS
implies booke or 40x. Lazy EE is a CONFIG_PPC64 thing, not specifically
CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64.
> + /* With lazy interrut we have to update thread dbcr0 here
s/interrut/interrupts/
> + * to make sure we can set debug properly at last to invoke
> + * kgdb again to work well.
> + */
> + current->thread.dbcr0 = dbcr0;
> +#endif
> linux_regs->msr |= MSR_DE;
> #else
> linux_regs->msr |= MSR_SE;
Hmm, what happens here if we enable KGDB on booke without
CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS? Kconfig doesn't appear to prevent it.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 10:28 [v5][PATCH 0/6] powerpc/book3e: powerpc/book3e: make kgdb to work well Tiejun Chen
2013-06-20 10:28 ` [v5][PATCH 1/6] powerpc/book3e: load critical/machine/debug exception stack Tiejun Chen
2013-10-18 22:37 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-23 9:26 ` "“tiejun.chen”"
2013-10-18 23:55 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-23 9:28 ` "“tiejun.chen”"
2013-06-20 10:28 ` [v5][PATCH 2/6] powerpc/book3e: store critical/machine/debug exception thread info Tiejun Chen
2013-10-18 22:43 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-23 9:27 ` "“tiejun.chen”"
2013-06-20 10:28 ` [v5][PATCH 3/6] book3e/kgdb: update thread's dbcr0 Tiejun Chen
2013-10-18 22:57 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-10-23 9:27 ` "“tiejun.chen”"
2013-06-20 10:28 ` [v5][PATCH 4/6] powerpc/book3e: support kgdb for kernel space Tiejun Chen
2013-10-18 22:58 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-23 9:27 ` "“tiejun.chen”"
2013-06-20 10:28 ` [v5][PATCH 5/6] powerpc/kgdb: use DEFINE_PER_CPU to allocate kgdb's thread_info Tiejun Chen
2013-06-20 10:28 ` [v5][PATCH 6/6] book3e/kgdb: Fix a single stgep case of lazy IRQ Tiejun Chen
2013-10-18 23:32 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-23 9:28 ` "“tiejun.chen”"
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382137030.7979.914.camel@snotra.buserror.net \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).