From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B1A2C00C5 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:16:41 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1383293781.28909.39.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: move definition of of_find_next_cache_node into common code. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:16:21 +1100 In-Reply-To: <527231DA.9060002@arm.com> References: <1379501585-12532-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1379501585-12532-3-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1383196834.28909.7.camel@pasglop> <527231DA.9060002@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 10:32 +0000, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > Thanks for the follow up. Grant wanted to see usage of this outside PPC and I > pointed him[0] to the RFC[1] I had posted to support cacheinfo on ARM. > > These patches are based on v3.12-rc1, let me know if you want me to > rebase/repost on any particular version. I've applied them to powerpc-next Cheers, Ben.