Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig

[Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>]

On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 16:49 -0600, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie-
> > fei.zang=freescale.com@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Scott Wood
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:05 PM
> > To: Pan Lijun-B44306
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into
> > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig
> > 
> > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:25 -0600, Lijun Pan wrote:
> > > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig already have
> > CONFIG_P1023RDS=y.
> > > Merge CONFIG_P1023RDB=y and other relevant configurations into
> > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85_defconfig.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan@freescale.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig  |  188 --------------------
> > --------
> > >  arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig     |   18 +++
> > >  arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig |   17 +++
> > >  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)  delete mode
> > > 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig
> > 
> > Are we still going to want to have one defconfig if and when we finally
> > get datapath support upstream?  That's a lot of code to add to the 85xx
> > config just for this one chip.
> P1023 has dpaa.
> Will mpc85xx_defconfig or mpc85xx_smp_defconfig support dpaa?

That's the question I'm asking.  Though I suppose we could take a patch
like this one for now, and then introduce mpc85xx_dpaa_defconfig when it
becomes relevant (which would make clear why the defconfig is separate).
p1023 would still work with the non-dpaa defconfigs, but without dpaa
support.

-Scott