From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B585A2C00AD for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:52:23 +1100 (EST) Received: from mail83-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail83-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C93160076 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.253]) by mail83-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AF1480097 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1384296734.1403.72.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig From: Scott Wood To: Zang Roy-R61911 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:52:14 -0600 In-Reply-To: <3E027F8168735B46AC006B1D0C7BB0020B37812C@039-SN2MPN1-011.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <1383952632-5770-1-git-send-email-Lijun.Pan@freescale.com> <1384197913-24610-1-git-send-email-Lijun.Pan@freescale.com> <1384293891.1403.70.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <3E027F8168735B46AC006B1D0C7BB0020B37812C@039-SN2MPN1-011.039d.mgd.msft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Pan Lijun-B44306 , "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 16:49 -0600, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie- > > fei.zang=freescale.com@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Scott Wood > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:05 PM > > To: Pan Lijun-B44306 > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into > > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:25 -0600, Lijun Pan wrote: > > > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig already have > > CONFIG_P1023RDS=y. > > > Merge CONFIG_P1023RDB=y and other relevant configurations into > > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85_defconfig. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan > > > --- > > > arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig | 188 -------------------- > > -------- > > > arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig | 18 +++ > > > arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig | 17 +++ > > > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) delete mode > > > 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig > > > > Are we still going to want to have one defconfig if and when we finally > > get datapath support upstream? That's a lot of code to add to the 85xx > > config just for this one chip. > P1023 has dpaa. > Will mpc85xx_defconfig or mpc85xx_smp_defconfig support dpaa? That's the question I'm asking. Though I suppose we could take a patch like this one for now, and then introduce mpc85xx_dpaa_defconfig when it becomes relevant (which would make clear why the defconfig is separate). p1023 would still work with the non-dpaa defconfigs, but without dpaa support. -Scott