From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from db8outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db8lp0185.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9C862C00C1 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:46:29 +1100 (EST) Received: from mail122-db8 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail122-db8-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F27220500 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 01:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB8EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.8.234]) by mail122-db8.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF244801D7 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 01:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1384307175.1403.118.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig From: Scott Wood To: Emil Medve Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:46:15 -0600 In-Reply-To: <5282B277.4090300@Freescale.com> References: <1383952632-5770-1-git-send-email-Lijun.Pan@freescale.com> <1384197913-24610-1-git-send-email-Lijun.Pan@freescale.com> <1384293891.1403.70.camel__45039.5534084693$1384293935$gmane$org@snotra.buserror.net> <5282B277.4090300@Freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 16:57 -0600, Emil Medve wrote: > Hello Scott, > > > On 11/12/2013 04:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:25 -0600, Lijun Pan wrote: > >> mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig already have CONFIG_P1023RDS=y. > >> Merge CONFIG_P1023RDB=y and other relevant configurations into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85_defconfig. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan > >> --- > >> arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig | 188 ---------------------------- > >> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig | 18 +++ > >> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig | 17 +++ > >> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) > >> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig > > > > Are we still going to want to have one defconfig if and when we finally > > get datapath support upstream? That's a lot of code to add to the 85xx > > config just for this one chip. > > Yes. But for mpc85xx_/smp_defconfig the datapath support shouldn't be > enabled by default given that just one SoC in that family has the > datapath (and we don't plan to put it in another e500v2 based SoC). For > regression/automation purposes config fragments should be used Is there any way to specify a meta-config for p1023 (or e500v2-dpaa or whatever) that says to combine mpc85xx_smp_defconfig with a dpaa fragment? Do we have any config fragments in the tree so far? -Scott