From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from db9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db9lp0253.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4DE62C00AA for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:04:28 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1384830256.1403.340.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/fsl_pamu: use physical cpu index to find the matched cpu nodes From: Scott Wood To: Varun Sethi Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 21:04:16 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <1384457440.2144.15.camel@haiying-laptop> <1384467025.1403.210.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <1384803449.1403.313.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "joro@8bytes.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 20:42 -0600, Varun Sethi wrote: > For the DSP case again we have to set up the stash attribute. Are you saying that this should be a separate attribute? Not necessarily a separate attribute, but there should be some way to distinguish whether you're providing a Linux cpu number or some external stash destination. -Scott