linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
To: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, r61911@freescale.com,
	b07421@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/gpio: Fix the wrong GPIO input data on MPC8572/MPC8536
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:07:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384913245.16677.5.camel@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131119163230.70964d1f@crub>

On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 16:32 +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:16:29 +0800
> Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com> wrote:
> 
> > For MPC8572/MPC8536, the status of GPIOs defined as output
> > cannot be determined by reading GPDAT register, so the code
> > use shadow data register instead. But if the input pins are
> > asserted high, they will always read high due to the shadow
> > data, even if the pins are set to low.
> 
> Could you please add a better description of the problem?
> I'm having some difficulties to understand the last sentence
> above. Does the issue appear if some pins were configured as
> inputs and were asserted high before booting the kernel, and
> therefore the shadow data has been initialized with these pin
> values?
> 
> Or does the issue appear if some pin has been configured as output
> first and has been set to the high value, then reconfigured as
> input? Now reading the pin state will always return high even
> if the actual pin state is low?
> 
> It seems the issue will appear in both cases. If so, please add
> this information to the commit message.
> 
Yes, you are right.
I'll updated the description more clear.

> >  	val = in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DAT) & ~in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DIR);
> > +	mpc8xxx_gc->data &= in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DIR);
> 
> we can reduce one in_be32() call here, i.e.
> 
> 	u32 out_mask;
> 	...
> 	out_mask = in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DIR);
> 	val = in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DAT) & ~out_mask;
> 	mpc8xxx_gc->data &= out_mask;
> 
> >  	return (val | mpc8xxx_gc->data) & mpc8xxx_gpio2mask(gpio);
> >  }
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anatolij
> 
Granted, it will be better to reduce one in_be32() call.
I'll improve the method based on your and Scott's comments.

Thanks
Liu Gang

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-20  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-15  7:16 [PATCH] powerpc/gpio: Fix the wrong GPIO input data on MPC8572/MPC8536 Liu Gang
2013-11-19  9:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 15:32 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2013-11-20  2:07   ` Liu Gang [this message]
2013-11-19 22:51 ` Scott Wood
2013-11-20  2:54   ` Liu Gang
2013-11-21  0:32     ` Scott Wood
2013-11-22  4:47       ` Liu Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1384913245.16677.5.camel@linux \
    --to=gang.liu@freescale.com \
    --cc=agust@denx.de \
    --cc=b07421@freescale.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=r61911@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).