From: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
To: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, r61911@freescale.com,
b07421@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/gpio: Fix the wrong GPIO input data on MPC8572/MPC8536
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:07:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384913245.16677.5.camel@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131119163230.70964d1f@crub>
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 16:32 +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:16:29 +0800
> Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com> wrote:
>
> > For MPC8572/MPC8536, the status of GPIOs defined as output
> > cannot be determined by reading GPDAT register, so the code
> > use shadow data register instead. But if the input pins are
> > asserted high, they will always read high due to the shadow
> > data, even if the pins are set to low.
>
> Could you please add a better description of the problem?
> I'm having some difficulties to understand the last sentence
> above. Does the issue appear if some pins were configured as
> inputs and were asserted high before booting the kernel, and
> therefore the shadow data has been initialized with these pin
> values?
>
> Or does the issue appear if some pin has been configured as output
> first and has been set to the high value, then reconfigured as
> input? Now reading the pin state will always return high even
> if the actual pin state is low?
>
> It seems the issue will appear in both cases. If so, please add
> this information to the commit message.
>
Yes, you are right.
I'll updated the description more clear.
> > val = in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DAT) & ~in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DIR);
> > + mpc8xxx_gc->data &= in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DIR);
>
> we can reduce one in_be32() call here, i.e.
>
> u32 out_mask;
> ...
> out_mask = in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DIR);
> val = in_be32(mm->regs + GPIO_DAT) & ~out_mask;
> mpc8xxx_gc->data &= out_mask;
>
> > return (val | mpc8xxx_gc->data) & mpc8xxx_gpio2mask(gpio);
> > }
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anatolij
>
Granted, it will be better to reduce one in_be32() call.
I'll improve the method based on your and Scott's comments.
Thanks
Liu Gang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-15 7:16 [PATCH] powerpc/gpio: Fix the wrong GPIO input data on MPC8572/MPC8536 Liu Gang
2013-11-19 9:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 15:32 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2013-11-20 2:07 ` Liu Gang [this message]
2013-11-19 22:51 ` Scott Wood
2013-11-20 2:54 ` Liu Gang
2013-11-21 0:32 ` Scott Wood
2013-11-22 4:47 ` Liu Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1384913245.16677.5.camel@linux \
--to=gang.liu@freescale.com \
--cc=agust@denx.de \
--cc=b07421@freescale.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=r61911@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).