From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] powerpc/CoreNet64: compile with CONFIG_E{5,6}500_CPU well
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:41:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384965671.1403.414.camel@snotra.buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384936551-8494-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 16:35 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> CONFIG_ALTIVEC is always enabled for CoreNet64.
In the defconfig perhaps, but this isn't a generally true statement.
> And if we select CONFIG_E{5,6}500_CPU this may introduce -mcpu=e500mc64
> into $CFLAGS. But Altivec and Spe options not allowed with
> e500mc64, so :
Sigh.
> CC arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.o
> arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.c:1:0: error: AltiVec not supported in this target
> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/powerpc/lib] Error 2
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
> index 95a20e1..641a77d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
> @@ -40,5 +40,8 @@ obj-y += code-patching.o
> obj-y += feature-fixups.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FTR_FIXUP_SELFTEST) += feature-fixups-test.o
>
> +# Altivec and Spe options not allowed with e500mc64 in GCC.
> +ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn,-mcpu=e500mc64),n)
> obj-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC) += xor_vmx.o
> CFLAGS_xor_vmx.o += -maltivec -mabi=altivec
> +endif
This does not seem like the right fix. What if GCC supports both
-mcpu=e500mc64 and -mcpu=e6500, and we're using the latter? Or for that
matter, if we're using -mcpu=whatever-ibm-chip-has-this?
Plus, wouldn't you need to do something to prevent code in that file
from being called?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 8:35 [RFC][PATCH] powerpc/CoreNet64: compile with CONFIG_E{5, 6}500_CPU well Tiejun Chen
2013-11-20 16:41 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-11-20 18:47 ` Kumar Gala
2013-11-20 22:03 ` [RFC][PATCH] powerpc/CoreNet64: compile with CONFIG_E{5,6}500_CPU well Scott Wood
2013-11-21 8:59 ` [RFC][PATCH] powerpc/CoreNet64: compile with CONFIG_E{5, 6}500_CPU well "“tiejun.chen”"
2013-11-21 17:42 ` [RFC][PATCH] powerpc/CoreNet64: compile with CONFIG_E{5,6}500_CPU well Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1384965671.1403.414.camel@snotra.buserror.net \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).