From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add scaled time to taskstats based process accounting
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:56:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13853.1187326604@neuling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C52872.9060408@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In message <46C52872.9060408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> you wrote:
> Michael Neuling wrote:
> >> I'd also request for you to add a cpu_scaled_run_real_total for use
> >> by delay accounting. cpu_scaled_run_real_total should be similar in
> >> functionality to cpu_run_real_total.
> >
> > Will do. Should I add cpu_scaled_run_real_total to the end of the
> > struct taskstat, or next to cpu_run_real_total?
> >
>
> Please add it to the end, that helps maintain binary compatibility
> across all versions of taskstats.
OK
>
> >>> /* Note: this timer irq context must be accounted for as well. */
> >>> - if (user_tick)
> >>> + if (user_tick) {
> >>> account_user_time(p, jiffies_to_cputime(1));
> >>> - else
> >>> + account_user_time_scaled(p, jiffies_to_cputime(1));
> >>> + } else {
> >>> account_system_time(p, HARDIRQ_OFFSET, jiffies_to_cputime(1));
> >>> + account_system_time_scaled(p, jiffies_to_cputime(1));
> >>> + }
> >> I am a little confused here, scaled accounting and regular accounting
> >> go hand in hand?
> >
> > We need to account for scaled and normal time in this generic code.
> > All other calls to account_(user|system)_time are in arch code.
> >
>
> So the assumption here is that we ran at full frequency during
> this time, is my understanding correct?
Yes.
I guess we could keep a per CPU last scaling factor for this case
(similar to what we are storing in the POWERPC paca)
Mikey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-17 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 7:09 [PATCH 1/2] Add scaled time to taskstats based process accounting Michael Neuling
2007-08-16 7:26 ` Balbir Singh
2007-08-17 0:23 ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-17 4:47 ` Balbir Singh
2007-08-17 4:56 ` Michael Neuling [this message]
2007-08-17 1:09 ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-17 18:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-17 19:08 ` Balbir Singh
2007-08-19 8:56 ` Balbir Singh
2007-08-19 13:12 ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-16 16:38 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-08-16 22:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-08-17 17:10 ` Linas Vepstas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13853.1187326604@neuling.org \
--to=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).