linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
	sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 09/10] power8, perf: Change BHRB branch filter configuration
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:08:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387325285.19507.1.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52AAC356.1000308@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 13:50 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > 
> > As I said in my comments on version 3 which you ignored:
> > 
> >     I think it would be clearer if we actually checked for the possibilities we
> >     allow and let everything else fall through, eg:
> > 
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â /* Ignore user/kernel/hv bits */
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â branch_sample_type &= ~PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL;
> > 
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â return 0;
> > 
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL)
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â return POWER8_MMCRA_IFM1;
> > Â 
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND)
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â return POWER8_MMCRA_IFM3;
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â return -1;
> > 
> 
> Hey Michael,
> 
> This patch only adds support for the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND filter, if the
> over all code flow does not clearly suggest that all combinations of any of
> these HW filters are invalid, then we can go with one more patch to clean
> that up before or after this patch but not here in this patch. Finally the
> code section here will look something like this. Does it sound good ?

Better, but not quite.

> static u64 power8_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
> {
>         u64 pmu_bhrb_filter = 0;
> 
>         /* BHRB and regular PMU events share the same privilege state
>          * filter configuration. BHRB is always recorded along with a
>          * regular PMU event. As the privilege state filter is handled
>          * in the basic PMC configuration of the accompanying regular
>          * PMU event, we ignore any separate BHRB specific request.
>          */
> 
>         /* Ignore user, kernel, hv bits */
>         branch_sample_type &= ~PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL;
> 
>         if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
>                 return pmu_bhrb_filter;

return 0;

> 
> 
>         if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL) {
>                 pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER8_MMCRA_IFM1;
>                 return pmu_bhrb_filter;

return POWER8_MMCRA_IFM1;

>         }
> 
>         if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND) {
>                 pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER8_MMCRA_IFM3;
>                 return pmu_bhrb_filter;

return POWER8_MMCRA_IFM3;

>         }
> 
>         /* Every thing else is unsupported */
>         return -1;
> }

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-18  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04 10:32 [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 01/10] perf: Add PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 02/10] powerpc, perf: Enable conditional branch filter for POWER8 Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 03/10] perf, tool: Conditional branch filter 'cond' added to perf record Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 04/10] x86, perf: Add conditional branch filtering support Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-06 16:46   ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 05/10] perf, documentation: Description for conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 06/10] powerpc, perf: Change the name of HW PMU branch filter tracking variable Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 07/10] powerpc, lib: Add new branch instruction analysis support functions Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-10  6:09     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-20 10:06       ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 08/10] powerpc, perf: Enable SW filtering in branch stack sampling framework Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-10  5:57     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-12  8:45       ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-13  2:47         ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-20 11:01     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-24  3:29       ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-24  3:50         ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-24  4:35           ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 09/10] power8, perf: Change BHRB branch filter configuration Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-13  8:20     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-18  0:08       ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2013-12-18  3:55         ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 10/10] powerpc, perf: Cleanup SW branch filter list look up Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-20 11:06     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-05  4:47 ` [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter Michael Ellerman
2013-12-06 13:18   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-09  0:41     ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1387325285.19507.1.camel@concordia \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).