From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0241.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAC8B2C00A5 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:46:13 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1387338359.3140.40.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [v3][PATCH 6/8] book3e/kexec/kdump: implement ppc64 kexec specfic From: Scott Wood To: Tiejun Chen Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 21:45:59 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1373357007-30785-7-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com> References: <1373357007-30785-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com> <1373357007-30785-7-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 16:03 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: > ppc64 kexec mechanism has a different implementation with ppc32. > > Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen Could you describe the relevant differences? -Scott