linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
	sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 08/10] powerpc, perf: Enable SW filtering in branch stack sampling framework
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:29:50 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387855790.15093.1.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B42394.4060705@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 16:31 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> +
> >> +	if (bhrb_sw_filter & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL) {
> >> +		/* XL-form instruction */
> >> +		if (instr_is_branch_xlform(*addr)) {
> >> +
> >> +			/* LR should be set */
> >> +			if (is_branch_link_set(*addr)) {
> >> +				/*
> >> +			 	 * Conditional and unconditional
> >> +			 	 * branch to CTR.
> >> +			 	 */
> >> +				if (is_xlform_ctr(*addr))
> >> +					result = true;
> >> +
> >> +				/*
> >> +			 	 * Conditional and unconditional
> >> +			 	 * branch to LR.
> >> +			 	 */
> >> +				if (is_xlform_lr(*addr))
> >> +					result = true;
> >> +
> >> +				/*
> >> +			 	 * Conditional and unconditional
> >> +			 	 * branch to TAR.
> >> +			 	 */
> >> +				if (is_xlform_tar(*addr))
> >> +					result = true;
> > 
> > What other kind of XL-Form branch is there?
> 
> I am not sure. Do you know of any ?

That was my point. There are no other types, so you can just do:

	if (bhrb_sw_filter & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
		if (instr_is_branch_xlform(*addr) && is_branch_link_set(*addr))
			return true;

> >> +	if (bhrb_sw_filter & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND) {
> >> +
> >> +		/* I-form instruction - excluded */
> >> +		if (instr_is_branch_iform(*addr))
> >> +			goto out;
> >> +
> >> +		/* B-form or XL-form instruction */
> >> +		if (instr_is_branch_bform(*addr) || instr_is_branch_xlform(*addr))  {
> >> +
> >> +			/* Not branch always  */
> >> +			if (!is_bo_always(*addr)) {
> >> +
> >> +				/* Conditional branch to CTR register */
> >> +				if (is_bo_ctr(*addr))
> >> +					goto out;
> > 
> > We might have discussed this but why not?
> 
> Did not get that, discuss what ?

Why are we saying a conditional branch to the CTR is not a conditional branch?

It is conditional, so I think it should be included.

> >> +
> >> +				/* CR[BI] conditional branch with static hint */
> > 
> > A conditional branch with a static hint is still a conditional branch?
> 
> No its not. 

Yes it is?

In fact they could be very interesting branches. Because the compiler or
programmer has statically hinted them, if the hint is wrong they may be a major
source of branch midpredicts.


> >> +				if (is_bo_crbi_off(*addr) || is_bo_crbi_on(*addr)) {
> >> +					if (is_bo_crbi_hint(*addr))
> >> +						goto out;
> >> +				}
> >> +
> >> +				result = true;
> >> +			}
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> >> +out:
> >> +	return result;
> >> +}
 
> >> +	} else {
> >> +		/*
> >> +		 * Userspace address needs to be
> >> +		 * copied first before analysis.
> >> +		 */
> >> +		pagefault_disable();
> >> +		ret =  __get_user_inatomic(instr, (unsigned int __user *)addr);
> > 
> > I suspect you borrowed this incantation from the callchain code. Unlike that
> > code you don't fallback to reading the page tables directly.
> > 
> > I'd rather see the accessor in the callchain code made generic and have you
> > call it here.
> 
> You have mentioned to take care of this issue yourself.

Yes I will.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-24  3:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04 10:32 [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 01/10] perf: Add PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 02/10] powerpc, perf: Enable conditional branch filter for POWER8 Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 03/10] perf, tool: Conditional branch filter 'cond' added to perf record Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 04/10] x86, perf: Add conditional branch filtering support Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-06 16:46   ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 05/10] perf, documentation: Description for conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 06/10] powerpc, perf: Change the name of HW PMU branch filter tracking variable Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 07/10] powerpc, lib: Add new branch instruction analysis support functions Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-10  6:09     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-20 10:06       ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 08/10] powerpc, perf: Enable SW filtering in branch stack sampling framework Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-10  5:57     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-12  8:45       ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-13  2:47         ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-20 11:01     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-24  3:29       ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2013-12-24  3:50         ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-24  4:35           ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 09/10] power8, perf: Change BHRB branch filter configuration Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-13  8:20     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-18  0:08       ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-18  3:55         ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 10/10] powerpc, perf: Cleanup SW branch filter list look up Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-20 11:06     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-05  4:47 ` [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter Michael Ellerman
2013-12-06 13:18   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-09  0:41     ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1387855790.15093.1.camel@concordia \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).