linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	paulus@samba.org,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] powerpc: thp: Fix crash on mremap
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:29:46 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1388665786.4373.48.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zjneodtw.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:22 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > Just use config option directly:
> >
> >       if (new_ptl != old_ptl ||
> >               IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_THP_MOVE_PMD_ALWAYS_WITHDRAW))
> 
> 
> I didn't like that. I found the earlier one easier for reading.
> If you and others strongly feel about this, I can redo the patch.
> Please let me know

Yes, use IS_ENABLED, no need to have two indirections of #define's

Another option is to have

	if (pmd_move_must_withdraw(new,old)) {
	}

With in a generic header:

#ifndef pmd_move_must_withdraw
static inline bool pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_ptl, ...)
{
	return new_ptl != old_ptl;
}
#endif

And in powerpc:

static inline bool pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_ptl, ...)
{
	return true;
}
#define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-02 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-02  9:17 [PATCH -V2] powerpc: thp: Fix crash on mremap Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-02  9:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-01-02 10:52   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-02 12:29     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2014-01-03  5:28       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1388665786.4373.48.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).