From: Dongsheng Wang <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
To: <scottwood@freescale.com>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/mpic: supply a .disable callback
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:38:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389073086-6763-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com> (raw)
From: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
Currently MPIC provides .mask, but not .disable. This means that
effectively disable_irq() soft-disables the interrupt, and you get
a .mask call if an interrupt actually occurs.
I'm not sure if this was intended as a performance benefit (it seems common
to omit .disable on powerpc interrupt controllers, but nowhere else), but it
interacts badly with threaded/workqueue interrupts (including KVM
reflection). In such cases, where the real interrupt handler does a
disable_irq_nosync(), schedules defered handling, and returns, we get two
interrupts for every real interrupt. The second interrupt does nothing
but see that IRQ_DISABLED is set, and decide that it would be a good
idea to actually call .mask.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
index 0e166ed..dd7564b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
@@ -975,6 +975,7 @@ void mpic_set_destination(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpuid)
}
static struct irq_chip mpic_irq_chip = {
+ .irq_disable = mpic_mask_irq,
.irq_mask = mpic_mask_irq,
.irq_unmask = mpic_unmask_irq,
.irq_eoi = mpic_end_irq,
@@ -984,6 +985,7 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_irq_chip = {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static struct irq_chip mpic_ipi_chip = {
+ .irq_disable = mpic_mask_ipi,
.irq_mask = mpic_mask_ipi,
.irq_unmask = mpic_unmask_ipi,
.irq_eoi = mpic_end_ipi,
@@ -991,6 +993,7 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_ipi_chip = {
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static struct irq_chip mpic_tm_chip = {
+ .irq_disable = mpic_mask_tm,
.irq_mask = mpic_mask_tm,
.irq_unmask = mpic_unmask_tm,
.irq_eoi = mpic_end_irq,
@@ -1001,6 +1004,7 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_tm_chip = {
static struct irq_chip mpic_irq_ht_chip = {
.irq_startup = mpic_startup_ht_irq,
.irq_shutdown = mpic_shutdown_ht_irq,
+ .irq_disable = mpic_mask_irq,
.irq_mask = mpic_mask_irq,
.irq_unmask = mpic_unmask_ht_irq,
.irq_eoi = mpic_end_ht_irq,
--
1.8.5
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 5:38 Dongsheng Wang [this message]
2014-01-07 5:49 ` [PATCH] powerpc/mpic: supply a .disable callback Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-01-07 10:18 ` Dongsheng.Wang
2014-01-07 21:19 ` Scott Wood
2014-01-07 23:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-01-07 6:38 ` Scott Wood
2014-01-07 9:55 ` Dongsheng.Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389073086-6763-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com \
--to=dongsheng.wang@freescale.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).