From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
chzigotzky@xenosoft.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix alignment of secondary cpu spin vars
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 15:09:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389154189.2076.5.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103081219.GA10233@quad.lixom.net>
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 00:12 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:56:04PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> > This makes things interesting though. The BE/LE trampoline code
> > assumes at least 3 consecutive instructions. What was the reasoning
> > behind entering the kernel LE instead of keeping the old boot protocol
> > and just switching to LE once kernel is loaded? Is it actually used on
> > some platforms or is this just a theoretical thing?
>
> Actually, adding a little hack that zeroes out the memory once we're done
> executing it will work just fine too. I know this is sort of icky, but maybe
> it'll be good enough for now?
>
> Of course, main worry is that this is just hiding some latent NULL deref in
> the kernel now... :-/
Wow, that would have to come close to winning the grossest-hack-in-arch-powerpc
award :)
Have you tried changing the value at 8 to point to a reserved page?
Some other possibilities:
* Change the #define so FIXUP_ENDIAN is empty for PASEMI, that would mean
you'd only be able to boot pasemi_defconfig.
* Move the hack into FIXUP_ENDIAN
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-28 21:01 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix alignment of secondary cpu spin vars Olof Johansson
2013-12-28 21:05 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-03 7:56 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-03 8:12 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-08 4:09 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2014-01-08 4:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-01-08 17:48 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-09 1:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <52CDC12F.5030407@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <52D6E829.1050504@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <52D6E89C.7010407@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <52D6E928.7050307@xenosoft.de>
2014-01-22 10:18 ` [Bug 67811] PASEMI: Kernel 3.13.0 doesn't boot with a PA6T cpu Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-23 21:29 ` PASEMI: Kernel 3.15.0-rc6 " Christian Zigotzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389154189.2076.5.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).