From: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: PowerPC email list <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH powerpc] Fix compile error of pgtable-ppc64.h
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:30:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389965453.5628.3.camel@ThinkPad-T5421> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vbxj6qp1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:27 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > It seems that forward declaration couldn't work well with typedef, use
> > struct spinlock directly to avoiding following build errors:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:81,
> > from include/linux/seqlock.h:35,
> > from include/linux/time.h:5,
> > from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56,
> > from include/linux/timex.h:56,
> > from include/linux/sched.h:17,
> > from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17:
> > include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t'
> > /root/linux-next/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here
> >
>
> what compiler version ? I have seen that error in gcc 4.3 and it was
> concluded that it is too old a compiler version to worry about. That
> specific compiler version also gave error for forward declaring struct;
gcc version 4.4.6 20110731 (Red Hat 4.4.6-3) (GCC), and it doesn't
report error after use struct directly.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h | 6 +++---
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> > index d27960c..bc141c9 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> > @@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > pmd_t *pmdp);
> >
> > #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
> > -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
> > -static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
> > - spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
> > +struct spinlock;
> > +static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
> > + struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl)
> > {
> > /*
> > * Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-17 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 6:10 [RFC PATCH powerpc] Fix compile error of pgtable-ppc64.h Li Zhong
2014-01-17 6:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-17 13:30 ` Li Zhong [this message]
2014-01-17 20:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389965453.5628.3.camel@ThinkPad-T5421 \
--to=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).