From: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] ppc/cell: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:01:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1390237306.3865.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389605449.1585.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
Le lundi 13 janvier 2014 à 10:30 +0100, Yann Droneaud a écrit :
> Le lundi 13 janvier 2014 à 10:06 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 18:39 +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> > > Macro get_unused_fd() is used to allocate a file descriptor with
> > > default flags. Those default flags (0) can be "unsafe":
> > > O_CLOEXEC must be used by default to not leak file descriptor
> > > across exec().
> > >
> > > Instead of macro get_unused_fd(), functions anon_inode_getfd()
> > > or get_unused_fd_flags() should be used with flags given by userspace.
> > > If not possible, flags should be set to O_CLOEXEC to provide userspace
> > > with a default safe behavor.
> > >
> > > In a further patch, get_unused_fd() will be removed so that
> > > new code start using anon_inode_getfd() or get_unused_fd_flags()
> > > with correct flags.
> > >
> > > This patch replaces calls to get_unused_fd() with equivalent call to
> > > get_unused_fd_flags(0) to preserve current behavor for existing code.
> > >
> > > The hard coded flag value (0) should be reviewed on a per-subsystem basis,
> > > and, if possible, set to O_CLOEXEC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
> >
> > Should I merge this (v5 on patchwork) or let Al do it ?
> >
>
> Please merge it directly: patches from the previous patchsets were
> picked individually by each subsystem maintainer after proper review
> regarding setting close on exec flag by default.
>
> > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> >
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Note:
> latest patch (from v5 patchset) is at
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fe27abcfab5563d36a3e5e58ff36e5500c39be6a.1388952061.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com
> v5 patchset is at
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1388952061.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com
>
I have not yet seen the patch in your trees at
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git/
I hope you would pick the patch, if possible in its latest version
(unfortunately I'm not able to give the link to the astest patch in
patchwork).
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-20 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-02 16:39 [PATCH 00/13] Getting rid of get_unused_fd() Yann Droneaud
2013-07-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 02/13] ppc/cell: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead " Yann Droneaud
2014-01-12 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-01-13 9:30 ` Yann Droneaud
2014-01-20 17:01 ` Yann Droneaud [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1390237306.3865.13.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ydroneaud@opteya.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).