From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37DAE2C00CD for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:57:48 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1391036256.8524.81.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix compile error of pgtable-ppc64.h From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Greg KH Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:57:36 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20140129184544.GA23204@kroah.com> References: <1390911762-5659-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1390911762-5659-2-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140129184544.GA23204@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , stable@vger.kernel.org, Li Zhong List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 10:45 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:52:42PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > From: Li Zhong > > > > It seems that forward declaration couldn't work well with typedef, use > > struct spinlock directly to avoiding following build errors: > > > > In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:81, > > from include/linux/seqlock.h:35, > > from include/linux/time.h:5, > > from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56, > > from include/linux/timex.h:56, > > from include/linux/sched.h:17, > > from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17: > > include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t' > > /root/linux-next/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here > > > > build fix for upstream SHA1: b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f > > for 3.13 stable series > > I don't understand, why is this needed? Is there a corrisponding patch > upstream that already does this? What went wrong with a "normal" > backport of the patch to 3.13? There's a corresponding patch in powerpc-next that I'm about to send to Linus today, but for the backport, the "fix" could be folded into the original offending patch. Cheers, Ben.