linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Cc: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:10:23 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392001823.3996.21.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207165801.GC2107@lst.de>

On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 17:58 +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>  typedef struct {
> -       volatile unsigned int slock;
> -} arch_spinlock_t;
> +       union {
> +               __ticketpair_t head_tail;
> +               struct __raw_tickets {
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__          /* The "tail" part should be in the MSBs */
> +                       __ticket_t tail, head;
> +#else
> +                       __ticket_t head, tail;
> +#endif
> +               } tickets;
> +       };
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
> +       u32 holder;
> +#endif
> +} arch_spinlock_t __aligned(4);

That's still broken with lockref (which we just merged).

We must have the arch_spinlock_t and the ref in the same 64-bit word
otherwise it will break.

We can make it work in theory since the holder doesn't have to be
accessed atomically, but the practicals are a complete mess ...
lockref would essentially have to re-implement the holder handling
of the spinlocks and use lower level ticket stuff.

Unless you can find a sneaky trick ... :-(

Ben.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10  3:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07 16:58 [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks Torsten Duwe
2014-02-07 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-07 17:55   ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-10  3:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2014-02-10 15:52   ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-10 17:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11  2:44     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  2:56       ` Al Viro
2014-02-11  3:38         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  9:53   ` Raghavendra KT
2014-02-11 10:40     ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-11 18:30       ` Scott Wood
2014-02-11 19:34         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  9:39 ` Raghavendra KT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1392001823.3996.21.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=duwe@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=tommusta@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).