From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1393417336.17341.0.camel@concordia> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: ftrace: bugfix for test_24bit_addr From: Michael Ellerman To: ananth@in.ibm.com Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:22:16 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20140226043552.GA14672@in.ibm.com> References: <1393381381-30179-1-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140226043552.GA14672@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Liu Ping Fan List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 10:05 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:23:01AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote: > > The branch target should be the func addr, not the addr of func_descr_t. > > So using ppc_function_entry() to generate the right target addr. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan > > --- > > This bug will make ftrace fail to work. It can be triggered when the kernel > > size grows up. > > --- > > arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c > > index 9b27b29..b0ded97 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c > > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, unsigned int old, unsigned int new) > > */ > > static int test_24bit_addr(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr) > > { > > + addr = ppc_function_entry((void *)addr); > > Won't this break on LE? ppc_function_entry() just needs to be a nop on LE, as it already is on 32-bit. cheers