From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0145.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5864140099 for ; Thu, 1 May 2014 04:26:40 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1398882391.24575.208.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Add cpu family documentation From: Scott Wood To: Tom Musta Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:26:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <53613D7B.8090001@gmail.com> References: <1391229347-23026-1-git-send-email-mpe@ellerman.id.au> <1391553822.6733.189.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <1398840308.5722.5.camel@concordia> <53613D7B.8090001@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:14 -0500, Tom Musta wrote: > On 4/30/2014 1:45 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> > Are 40x considered booke? > > You tell me. > > > > The original 401, 403 and 405 cores predate the actual existence of what we now call Book E. > But they most certainly contained features that would eventually become Book E (different timers, > software managed TLB, etc.) For the sake of this diagram, I would say "yes". CONFIG_BOOKE doesn't get set on 40x builds... -Scott