From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
michael@ellerman.id.au, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: [V6 07/11] powerpc, perf: Change the name of HW PMU branch filter tracking variable
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 14:39:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399280953-31442-8-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399280953-31442-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This patch simply changes the name of the variable from 'bhrb_filter' to
'bhrb_hw_filter' in order to add one more variable which will track SW
filters in generic powerpc book3s code which will be implemented in the
subsequent patch. This patch does not change any functionality.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 66bea54..1d7e909 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
int n_txn_start;
/* BHRB bits */
- u64 bhrb_filter; /* BHRB HW branch filter */
+ u64 bhrb_hw_filter; /* BHRB HW branch filter */
int bhrb_users;
void *bhrb_context;
struct perf_branch_stack bhrb_stack;
@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
mb();
if (cpuhw->bhrb_users)
- ppmu->config_bhrb(cpuhw->bhrb_filter);
+ ppmu->config_bhrb(cpuhw->bhrb_hw_filter);
write_mmcr0(cpuhw, mmcr0);
@@ -1405,7 +1405,7 @@ nocheck:
out:
if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
power_pmu_bhrb_enable(event);
- cpuhw->bhrb_filter = ppmu->bhrb_filter_map(
+ cpuhw->bhrb_hw_filter = ppmu->bhrb_filter_map(
event->attr.branch_sample_type);
}
@@ -1788,10 +1788,10 @@ static int power_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
err = power_check_constraints(cpuhw, events, cflags, n + 1);
if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
- cpuhw->bhrb_filter = ppmu->bhrb_filter_map(
+ cpuhw->bhrb_hw_filter = ppmu->bhrb_filter_map(
event->attr.branch_sample_type);
- if(cpuhw->bhrb_filter == -1)
+ if(cpuhw->bhrb_hw_filter == -1)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 9:09 [V6 00/11] perf: New conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 01/11] perf: Add PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 02/11] perf, tool: Conditional branch filter 'cond' added to perf record Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 03/11] x86, perf: Add conditional branch filtering support Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 04/11] perf, documentation: Description for conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 05/11] powerpc, perf: Re-arrange BHRB processing Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 06/11] powerpc, perf: Re-arrange PMU based branch filter processing in POWER8 Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 08/11] powerpc, lib: Add new branch analysis support functions Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 09/11] powerpc, perf: Enable SW filtering in branch stack sampling framework Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 10/11] power8, perf: Adapt BHRB PMU configuration to work with SW filters Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-05 9:09 ` [V6 11/11] powerpc, perf: Enable privilege mode SW branch filters Anshuman Khandual
2014-05-27 12:09 ` [V6 00/11] perf: New conditional branch filter Stephane Eranian
2014-05-28 8:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-06-02 12:59 ` Stephane Eranian
2014-06-02 16:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-06-02 16:25 ` Stephane Eranian
2014-06-02 22:52 ` Michael Neuling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1399280953-31442-8-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).