From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0208.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17BD1A0814 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 06:50:27 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1400705405.18239.92.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd/spi: support en25s64 device From: Scott Wood To: Shengzhou Liu Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:50:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1400666751-11459-1-git-send-email-Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com> References: <1400666751-11459-1-git-send-email-Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 18:05 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote: > Add support for EON en25s64 spi device. > > Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu > --- > drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > index 7eda71d..6989311 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = { > { "en25q32b", INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) }, > { "en25p64", INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) }, > { "en25q64", INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) }, > + { "en25s64", INFO(0x1c3817, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) }, > { "en25qh256", INFO(0x1c7019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) }, > > /* ESMT */ This needs to be sent to the mtd and/or spi maintainers, not here. What does this have to do with patch 2/2? Don't put unrelated things in the same patchset, especially when they're destined for different maintainers. -Scott