From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com [213.75.39.10]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7611A007D for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:33:30 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1400830406.31526.6.camel@x220> Subject: Re: powerpc: remove checks for CONFIG_BOOK3E_MMU_TLB_STATS From: Paul Bolle To: Scott Wood Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:33:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140522223758.GA20343@home.buserror.net> References: <1400608550.4912.48.camel@x220> <20140522223758.GA20343@home.buserror.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott, On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 17:37 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S: Assembler messages: > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:89: Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:238: Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:269: Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:281: Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:441: Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:510: Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:881: Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:918: Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' Thanks for testing! That's a bit surprising. The patch is intended to be a non event. Ie, it only removes what the preprocessor would have removed anyway. Unless I botched it, of course. What exactly did you test there? Paul Bolle