From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 558C51A0590
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 09:56:44 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <1401234974.8262.8.camel@pasglop>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: numa: enable USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 09:56:14 +1000
In-Reply-To: <20140527234420.GE4104@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20140516233945.GI8941@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20140519181423.GL8941@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20140527234420.GE4104@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
 Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
 linux-mm@kvack.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 16:44 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Ping on this and patch 2/2. Ben, would you be willing to pull these
> into
> your -next branch so they'd get some testing?
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/350368/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/349838/
> 
> Without any further changes, these two help quite a bit with the slab
> consumption on CONFIG_SLUB kernels when memoryless nodes are present.

I don't mind at all :-) I haven't really been following that story
so I was waiting for the dust to settle and maybe acks from MM people
but if you tell me they are good I'm prepared to trust you.

Cheers,
Ben.