* [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: bpf: Use correct mask while accessing the VLAN tag
@ 2014-06-24 9:59 Denis Kirjanov
2014-06-24 9:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: bpf: Fix the broken LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT test Denis Kirjanov
2014-06-24 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: bpf: Use correct mask while accessing the VLAN tag Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2014-06-24 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev
Use the proper mask which is 0xefff
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 6dcdade..af0ed4d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r_A, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
vlan_tci));
if (code == (BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG))
- PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, VLAN_VID_MASK);
+ PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
else
PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
break;
--
2.0.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: bpf: Fix the broken LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT test
2014-06-24 9:59 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: bpf: Use correct mask while accessing the VLAN tag Denis Kirjanov
@ 2014-06-24 9:59 ` Denis Kirjanov
2014-06-24 14:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-24 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: bpf: Use correct mask while accessing the VLAN tag Alexei Starovoitov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2014-06-24 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev
We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
or not, not jusr ORing the TCI with the mask which results to:
[ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
[ 709.412245] ret 4096 != 1
[ 709.412332] ret 4096 != 1
[ 709.412333] FAIL (2 times)
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index af0ed4d..a3d8f58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -394,8 +394,10 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
vlan_tci));
if (code == (BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG))
PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
- else
+ else {
PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
+ PPC_SRWI(r_A, r_A, 12);
+ }
break;
case BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_QUEUE:
BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff,
--
2.0.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: bpf: Fix the broken LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT test
2014-06-24 9:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: bpf: Fix the broken LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT test Denis Kirjanov
@ 2014-06-24 14:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-24 14:52 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2014-06-24 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov, netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
Hello.
On 06/24/2014 01:59 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
> or not, not jusr ORing the TCI with the mask which results to:
> [ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
> [ 709.412245] ret 4096 != 1
> [ 709.412332] ret 4096 != 1
> [ 709.412333] FAIL (2 times)
You need to sign off on the patch, else it won't be applied.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index af0ed4d..a3d8f58 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -394,8 +394,10 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
> vlan_tci));
> if (code == (BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG))
> PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
> - else
> + else {
All arms of the *if* statement should have {} if one branch has {}.
> PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
> + PPC_SRWI(r_A, r_A, 12);
> + }
> break;
> case BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_QUEUE:
> BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff,
WBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: bpf: Fix the broken LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT test
2014-06-24 14:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2014-06-24 14:52 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2014-06-24 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergei Shtylyov; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev
On 6/24/14, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 06/24/2014 01:59 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>
>> We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
>> or not, not jusr ORing the TCI with the mask which results to:
>
>> [ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
>> [ 709.412245] ret 4096 != 1
>> [ 709.412332] ret 4096 != 1
>> [ 709.412333] FAIL (2 times)
>
> You need to sign off on the patch, else it won't be applied.
Oh, right. Moreover I've made a mistake in the description (we're ANDing)
Thanks!
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> index af0ed4d..a3d8f58 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> @@ -394,8 +394,10 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp,
>> u32 *image,
>> vlan_tci));
>> if (code == (BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG))
>> PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
>> - else
>> + else {
>
> All arms of the *if* statement should have {} if one branch has {}.
>
>> PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
>> + PPC_SRWI(r_A, r_A, 12);
>> + }
>> break;
>> case BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_QUEUE:
>> BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff,
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: bpf: Use correct mask while accessing the VLAN tag
2014-06-24 9:59 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: bpf: Use correct mask while accessing the VLAN tag Denis Kirjanov
2014-06-24 9:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: bpf: Fix the broken LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT test Denis Kirjanov
@ 2014-06-24 15:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2014-06-24 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org> wrote:
> Use the proper mask which is 0xefff
sob is missing.
also please expand the commit message a bit, otherwise it's too cryptic for
folks who don't know bpf details.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 6dcdade..af0ed4d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
> PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r_A, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
> vlan_tci));
> if (code == (BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG))
> - PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, VLAN_VID_MASK);
> + PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
> else
> PPC_ANDI(r_A, r_A, VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
> break;
> --
> 2.0.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-24 15:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-24 9:59 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: bpf: Use correct mask while accessing the VLAN tag Denis Kirjanov
2014-06-24 9:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: bpf: Fix the broken LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT test Denis Kirjanov
2014-06-24 14:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-24 14:52 ` Denis Kirjanov
2014-06-24 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: bpf: Use correct mask while accessing the VLAN tag Alexei Starovoitov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).