From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714FE1A000B for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 14:41:22 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1404276081.7254.1.camel@concordia> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64 From: Michael Ellerman To: Masami Hiramatsu Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:41:21 +1000 In-Reply-To: <53B21B0E.8010707@hitachi.com> References: <20140620022307.23075.55858.stgit@kbuild-fedora.novalocal> <53B0D61B.9010104@hitachi.com> <1404128176.7888.1.camel@concordia> <53B21B0E.8010707@hitachi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, sparse@chrisli.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , akataria@vmware.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, Ingo Molnar , "Suzuki K. Poulose" , Fenghua Yu , Arnd Bergmann , Rusty Russell , Chris Wright , yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, Thomas Gleixner , Tony Luck , Kevin Hao , Linus Torvalds , rdunlap@infradead.org, Tony Luck , dl9pf@gmx.de, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 11:21 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/06/30 20:36), Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 12:14 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> Ping? :) > > > > Yeah sorry. I started looking at this and got dragged into another mess. > > > > You seem to have duplicated the functionality of arch_deref_entry_point(), > > which was also added for kprobes, and for the same reason - ie. because some > > arches have strange function pointers. Is there some reason you can't use it? > > Ah, right! Hmm, it seems some more work to update it. but basically, we can do. > BTW, is there any other users who need to access the actual function entry (for > kallsyms case)? Not that I'm aware of. We have had function descriptors on 64-bit powerpc for ever, so in theory by now we should have already found any cases where we need that sort of wrapper. cheers