From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 319611A01D6 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:22:10 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1405999319.5289.222.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] powerpc/powernv: Support PCI error injection From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Mike Qiu Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:21:59 +1000 In-Reply-To: <53CDD632.1050908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1403489682-14841-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1403489682-14841-3-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A91819.1010900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1403591761.4587.161.camel@pasglop> <53A9216C.8050904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1403593252.4587.163.camel@pasglop> <20140625000305.GA5742@shangw> <53AA3C5C.4080807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1403666349.4587.196.camel@pasglop> <53CCCA09.1060404@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1405982949.5289.217.camel@pasglop> <53CDD632.1050908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, agraf@suse.de List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 11:10 +0800, Mike Qiu wrote: > On 07/22/2014 06:49 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 16:06 +0800, Mike Qiu wrote: > >>> I don't like this. I much prefer have dedicated error injection files > >>> in their respective locations, something for PCI under the corresponding > >>> PCI bridge etc... > >> So PowerNV error injection will be designed rely on debugfs been > >> configured, right? > > Not necessarily. If we create a better debugfs layout for our PHBs, then > > yes. It might be useful to provide more info in there for example access > > to some of the counters ... > > > > But on the other hand, for error injection in general, I wonder if we should > > be under sysfs instead... something to study a bit. > > In pHyp, general error injection use syscall: > > #define __NR_rtas 255 > > I don't know if it is a good idea to reuse this syscall for PowerNV. > > At least, it is another choice without sysfs rely. No, we certainly don't want that RTAS stuff. I though Linux had some kind of error injection infrastructure nowadays... somebody needs to have a look. Cheers, Ben.