linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Aaron Sierra <asierra@xes-inc.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsl_ifc: Support all 8 IFC chip selects
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:51:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408729900.6510.2.camel@snotra.buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F755A0.8020504@freescale.com>

On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 20:07 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> Sorry Scott for late reply,
> 
> Please find my reply in-lined
> 
> 
> On 8/21/2014 4:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 09:05 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> >> On 8/20/2014 5:38 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 16:07 -0500, Aaron Sierra wrote:
> >>>> Freescale's QorIQ T Series processors support 8 IFC chip selects
> >>>> within a memory map backward compatible with previous P Series
> >>>> processors which supported only 4 chip selects.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@xes-inc.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    include/linux/fsl_ifc.h | 10 +++++-----
> >>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/fsl_ifc.h b/include/linux/fsl_ifc.h
> >>>> index 84d60cb..62762ff 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/linux/fsl_ifc.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/linux/fsl_ifc.h
> >>>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
> >>>>    #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >>>>    #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >>>>    
> >>>> -#define FSL_IFC_BANK_COUNT 4
> >>>> +#define FSL_IFC_BANK_COUNT 8
> >>> First please modify fsl_ifc_nand.c to limit itself to the number of
> >>> banks it dynamically determines are present based on the IFC version.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Number of available bank/chip select are defined by SoC and it is
> >> independent of SoC.
> > Do you mean defined by the SoC and independent of the IFC version?
> 
> IFC v 1.0.0 supports 4 Chip Select.
> IFC v 1.1.0 onwards, IFC supports 8 chip select.
> 
> But SoC finally defines number of chip select coming out of SoC. Like 
> LS1021A with IFC ver 1.4.0 have only 7 Chip Select.

What matters here is whether the registers are implemented, not whether
a chip select is pinned out -- so use the IFC version.

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-22 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-15 21:07 [PATCH 2/2] fsl_ifc: Support all 8 IFC chip selects Aaron Sierra
2014-08-20  0:08 ` Scott Wood
2014-08-20  3:35   ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2014-08-20 15:54     ` Aaron Sierra
2014-08-20 23:21     ` Scott Wood
2014-08-22 14:37       ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2014-08-22 17:51         ` Scott Wood [this message]
2014-08-25  6:28           ` Prabhakar Kushwaha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1408729900.6510.2.camel@snotra.buserror.net \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=asierra@xes-inc.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=prabhakar@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).