linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: 32 bit getcpu VDSO function uses 64 bit instructions
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:50:27 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417045827.16862.32.camel@otta> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417041497.12952.2.camel@concordia>

On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 09:38 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 08:11 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > I used some 64 bit instructions when adding the 32 bit getcpu VDSO
> > function. Fix it.
> 
> Ouch. The symptom is a SIGILL I presume?

Nope, you don't get a SIGILL when executing 64-bit instructions in
32-bit mode, so it'll happily just execute the instruction, doing
a full 64-bit compare.  I'm guessing that the upper 32-bits of both
r3 and r4 contain zeros, so we're probably just getting lucky.


> Could we catch this by forcing -m32 in the CFLAGS for vdso32 ?

As Segher mentioned, GCC passing -many down to the assembler means
-m32 won't help.  It was due to Anton disabling that gcc "feature",
that this was caught.

Peter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-27  4:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-26 21:11 [PATCH] powerpc: 32 bit getcpu VDSO function uses 64 bit instructions Anton Blanchard
2014-11-26 22:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-11-26 23:23   ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-11-26 23:28     ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-11-26 23:50   ` Peter Bergner [this message]
2014-11-27 16:08     ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-11-27 17:41       ` Peter Bergner
2014-11-27 20:50         ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-11-28  2:00           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-11-27 18:20       ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1417045827.16862.32.camel@otta \
    --to=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).