* [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support for parametrized events @ 2014-12-03 2:09 Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa, Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras Cc: peterz, linuxppc-dev, dev, linux-kernel Description of "event parameters" from the documentation patch: Event parameters are a basic way for partial events to be specified in sysfs with per-event names given to the fields that need to be filled in when using a particular event. It is intended for supporting cases where the single 'cpu' parameter is insufficient. For example, POWER 8 has events for physical sockets/cores/cpus that are accessible from with virtual machines. To keep using the single 'cpu' parameter we'd need to perform a mapping between Linux's cpus and the physical machine's cpus (in this case Linux is running under a hypervisor). This isn't possible because bindings between our cpus and physical cpus may not be fixed, and we probably won't have a "cpu" on each physical cpu. Description of the sysfs contents when events are parameterized (copied from an included patch): Examples: domain=0x1,offset=0x8,starting_index=$core In the case of the last example, a value replacing "$core" would need to be provided by the user selecting the particular event. This is refered to as "event parameterization". All non-numerical values indicate an event parameter. Notes on how perf-list displays parameterized events PARAMETERIZED EVENTS -------------------- Some pmu events listed by 'perf list' will be displayed with '$xyz' in them. For example: hv_24x7/HPM_THREAD_NAP_CCYC__PHYS_CORE,starting_index=$core/ This means that when provided as an event, a value for $core must also be supplied. For example: perf stat -e \ 'hv_24x7/HPM_THREAD_NAP_CCYC__PHYS_CORE,starting_index=2' ... Changelog[v5] - [Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra] Use '$arg' notation rather than ? to indicate event parameters. - [Michael Ellerman] Separate the kernel and tool patches in the patchset into different patchsets. Changelog[v4] - [Jiri Olsa] Rebase to perf/core tree (fix small merge conflict) Changelog[v3] - [Jiri Olsa] Changed the event parameters are specified. If event file specifes 'param=val' make the usage 'param=123' rather than 'val=123'. (patch 1,2/10) - Shortened event names using "PHYS" and "VCPU" (patch 4/10) - Print help message if invalid parameter is specified or required parameter is missing. - Moved 3 patches that are unrelated to parametrized events into a separate patchset. - Reordered patches so code changes come first. Changelog[v2] - [Joe Perches, David Laight] Use beNN_to_cpu() instead of guessing the size from type. - Use kmem_cache_free() to free page allocated with kmem_cache_alloc(). - Rebase to recent kernel Cody P Schafer (4): tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events tools/perf: extend format_alias() to include event parameters perf Documentation: add event parameters tools/perf: Document parameterized and symbolic events .../testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events | 6 ++ tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt | 13 +++ tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 12 +++ tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt | 20 ++++- tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 1 + tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++--- 6 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events 2014-12-03 2:09 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support for parametrized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-04 12:44 ` Jiri Olsa 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] tools/perf: extend format_alias() to include event parameters Sukadev Bhattiprolu ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa, Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras Cc: peterz, linuxppc-dev, dev, linux-kernel From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Enable event specification like: pmu/event_name,param1=0x1,param2=0x4/ Assuming that /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name Contains something like param2=$foo,bar=1,param1=$baz Changelog[v4]: [Jiri Olsa] Merge to recent perf-core and fix a small conflict. Changelog[v3]: [Jiri Olsa] If the sysfs event file specifies 'param=val', make the usage 'hv_24x7/event,param=123/' rather than 'hv_24x7/event,val=123/'. CC: Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com> CC: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Conflicts: tools/perf/util/pmu.c --- tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 1 + tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h index db2cf78..ca226ce 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct parse_events_term { int type_val; int type_term; struct list_head list; + bool used; }; struct parse_events_evlist { diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c index 5c9c494..cb516dd 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c @@ -551,31 +551,68 @@ static void pmu_format_value(unsigned long *format, __u64 value, __u64 *v, } /* + * Term is a string term, and might be a param-term. Try to look up it's value + * in the remaining terms. + * - We have a term like "base-or-format-term=param-term", + * - We need to find the value supplied for "param-term" (with param-term named + * in a config string) later on in the term list. + */ +static int pmu_resolve_param_term(struct parse_events_term *term, + struct list_head *head_terms, + __u64 *value) +{ + struct parse_events_term *t; + + list_for_each_entry(t, head_terms, list) { + if (t->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_NUM) { + if (!strcmp(t->config, term->config)) { + t->used = true; + *value = t->val.num; + return 0; + } + } + } + + if (verbose) + printf("Required parameter '%s' not specified\n", term->config); + + return -1; +} + +/* * Setup one of config[12] attr members based on the * user input data - term parameter. */ static int pmu_config_term(struct list_head *formats, struct perf_event_attr *attr, struct parse_events_term *term, + struct list_head *head_terms, bool zero) { struct perf_pmu_format *format; __u64 *vp; + __u64 val; + + /* + * If this is a parameter we've already used for parameterized-eval, + * skip it in normal eval. + */ + if (term->used) + return 0; /* - * Support only for hardcoded and numnerial terms. * Hardcoded terms should be already in, so nothing * to be done for them. */ if (parse_events__is_hardcoded_term(term)) return 0; - if (term->type_val != PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_NUM) - return -EINVAL; - format = pmu_find_format(formats, term->config); - if (!format) + if (!format) { + if (verbose) + printf("Invalid event/parameter '%s'\n", term->config); return -EINVAL; + } switch (format->value) { case PERF_PMU_FORMAT_VALUE_CONFIG: @@ -592,11 +629,16 @@ static int pmu_config_term(struct list_head *formats, } /* - * XXX If we ever decide to go with string values for - * non-hardcoded terms, here's the place to translate - * them into value. + * Either directly use a numeric term, or try to translate string terms + * using event parameters. */ - pmu_format_value(format->bits, term->val.num, vp, zero); + if (term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_NUM) + val = term->val.num; + else + if (pmu_resolve_param_term(term, head_terms, &val)) + return -EINVAL; + + pmu_format_value(format->bits, val, vp, zero); return 0; } @@ -607,9 +649,10 @@ int perf_pmu__config_terms(struct list_head *formats, { struct parse_events_term *term; - list_for_each_entry(term, head_terms, list) - if (pmu_config_term(formats, attr, term, zero)) + list_for_each_entry(term, head_terms, list) { + if (pmu_config_term(formats, attr, term, head_terms, zero)) return -EINVAL; + } return 0; } -- 1.8.3.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-04 12:44 ` Jiri Olsa 2014-12-05 23:05 ` Cody P Schafer 2014-12-07 7:37 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jiri Olsa @ 2014-12-04 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Michael Ellerman, peterz, linux-kernel, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, dev, Paul Mackerras, linuxppc-dev On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:09:35PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Enable event specification like: > > pmu/event_name,param1=0x1,param2=0x4/ > > Assuming that > > /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name > > Contains something like > > param2=$foo,bar=1,param1=$baz oops.. sorry to be PITA on this one.. I might have missed something in the previous discussion but I guess I might have finally some opinion on this ;-) here's how I think your patchset works: in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you can actually have: param2=foo,bar=1,param1=baz notice no '$', thats what you add later in 'perf list' output, right? Moreover it actually does not matter whats in value 'param2=HERE', because it's not used in the config code at all apart from the 'perf list' display processing. So when we discussed the '$' name way, I thought it'd be like: in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you have: param2=$foo,bar=1,param1=$baz and on command line you'd use: pmu/event_name,foo=0x1,bar=0x4/ to assign directly to the $var, which would justify the $var syntax I think.. anyway we could assign directly to the param term name as you do, but I think we just need to mark the term as parametrized, like: in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you have: param2=?,bar=1,param1=? and on command line you'd use: pmu/event_name,param2=0x1,param1=0x4/ while the config code would check that the param substitution is done only for terms with '?' in value, like 'param2=?' and not for all PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR type terms (as of now) thanks, jirka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events 2014-12-04 12:44 ` Jiri Olsa @ 2014-12-05 23:05 ` Cody P Schafer 2014-12-06 12:20 ` Jiri Olsa 2014-12-07 7:37 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Cody P Schafer @ 2014-12-05 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Michael Ellerman, Peter Zijlstra, LKML, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Paul Mackerras, Sukadev Bhattiprolu, Linux PPC On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:09:35PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: >> From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> Enable event specification like: >> >> pmu/event_name,param1=0x1,param2=0x4/ >> >> Assuming that >> >> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name >> >> Contains something like >> >> param2=$foo,bar=1,param1=$baz > > oops.. sorry to be PITA on this one.. I might have missed something > in the previous discussion but I guess I might have finally some > opinion on this ;-) > > here's how I think your patchset works: > > in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you can actually have: > > param2=foo,bar=1,param1=baz > > notice no '$', thats what you add later in 'perf list' output, right? > > Moreover it actually does not matter whats in value 'param2=HERE', > because it's not used in the config code at all apart from the > 'perf list' display processing. > > So when we discussed the '$' name way, I thought it'd be like: > > in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you have: > param2=$foo,bar=1,param1=$baz > > and on command line you'd use: > pmu/event_name,foo=0x1,bar=0x4/ > > to assign directly to the $var, which would justify the $var > syntax I think.. > Agreed, what you've described above sounds like a good idea. Compared to monopolizing all strings (which is what I did when initialy writing this), using a '$' prefix would allow less pain when some events suddenly need non-integer parameters. > anyway we could assign directly to the param term name as you do, > but I think we just need to mark the term as parametrized, like: > > in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you have: > param2=?,bar=1,param1=? > > and on command line you'd use: > pmu/event_name,param2=0x1,param1=0x4/ > > while the config code would check that the param substitution is > done only for terms with '?' in value, like 'param2=?' and not > for all PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR type terms (as of now) I prefer the `foo=0x1` as mentioned previously: it makes the user interface much less painful as we can have event-specific names for register/hcall fields. I'm pretty sure the code used to do this, not sure when it was removed (haven't been following this patchset closely). That said: I haven't fiddled with this code in a while (it's Suka's at this point), and there might be arguments the other way on both of those. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events 2014-12-05 23:05 ` Cody P Schafer @ 2014-12-06 12:20 ` Jiri Olsa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jiri Olsa @ 2014-12-06 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cody P Schafer Cc: Michael Ellerman, Peter Zijlstra, LKML, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Paul Mackerras, Sukadev Bhattiprolu, Linux PPC On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 06:05:26PM -0500, Cody P Schafer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:09:35PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > >> From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >> > >> Enable event specification like: > >> > >> pmu/event_name,param1=0x1,param2=0x4/ > >> > >> Assuming that > >> > >> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name > >> > >> Contains something like > >> > >> param2=$foo,bar=1,param1=$baz > > > > oops.. sorry to be PITA on this one.. I might have missed something > > in the previous discussion but I guess I might have finally some > > opinion on this ;-) > > > > here's how I think your patchset works: > > > > in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you can actually have: > > > > param2=foo,bar=1,param1=baz > > > > notice no '$', thats what you add later in 'perf list' output, right? > > > > Moreover it actually does not matter whats in value 'param2=HERE', > > because it's not used in the config code at all apart from the > > 'perf list' display processing. > > > > So when we discussed the '$' name way, I thought it'd be like: > > > > in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you have: > > param2=$foo,bar=1,param1=$baz > > > > and on command line you'd use: > > pmu/event_name,foo=0x1,bar=0x4/ > > > > to assign directly to the $var, which would justify the $var > > syntax I think.. > > > > Agreed, what you've described above sounds like a good idea. > > Compared to monopolizing all strings (which is what I did when > initialy writing this), using a '$' prefix would allow less pain when > some events suddenly need non-integer parameters. > > > anyway we could assign directly to the param term name as you do, > > but I think we just need to mark the term as parametrized, like: > > > > in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you have: > > param2=?,bar=1,param1=? > > > > and on command line you'd use: > > pmu/event_name,param2=0x1,param1=0x4/ > > > > while the config code would check that the param substitution is > > done only for terms with '?' in value, like 'param2=?' and not > > for all PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR type terms (as of now) > > I prefer the `foo=0x1` as mentioned previously: it makes the user > interface much less painful as we can have event-specific names for > register/hcall fields. > > I'm pretty sure the code used to do this, not sure when it was removed > (haven't been following this patchset closely). right, I recall seeing the 2 indirect assignments earlier, but it was without the '$' marks > > That said: I haven't fiddled with this code in a while (it's Suka's at > this point), and there might be arguments the other way on both of > those. I guess I'm ok with both ways, maybe slightly inclined to the '$' variable style one ;-) jirka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events 2014-12-04 12:44 ` Jiri Olsa 2014-12-05 23:05 ` Cody P Schafer @ 2014-12-07 7:37 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-08 10:59 ` Jiri Olsa 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-07 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Michael Ellerman, peterz, linux-kernel, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, dev, Paul Mackerras, linuxppc-dev Jiri Olsa [jolsa@redhat.com] wrote: | anyway we could assign directly to the param term name as you do, | but I think we just need to mark the term as parametrized, like: | | in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you have: | param2=?,bar=1,param1=? I like the idea of just using a single ? for required parameters, but the problem I had with this approach can be seen with these two sysfs entries: $ cat HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__PHYS_CORE domain=0x2,offset=0xe0,starting_index=core,lpar=0x0 $ cat HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__VCPU_HOME_CORE domain=0x3,offset=0xe0,starting_index=vcpu,lpar=sibling_guest_id The parameter 'starting_index' refers to a core in one event and vcpu in another event. We were trying to give a hint as to what it refers to. Given that, 'starting_index' is not very intuitive, how about discarding starting_index and replacing with what it really means for the event and, use a simple '?' to indicate required parameter). $ cat HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__PHYS_CORE domain=0x2,offset=0xe0,core=?,lpar=0x0 $ cat HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__VCPU_HOME_CORE domain=0x3,offset=0xe0,vcpu=?,lpar=? perf list shows these as: hv_24x7/HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__PHYS_CORE,core=?/ hv_24x7/HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__VCPU_HOME_CHIP,vcpu=?,lpar=?/ command line would be -e hv_24x7/HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__PHYS_CORE,core=2/ or -e hv_24x7/HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__VCPU_HOME_CHIP,vcpu=2,lpar=7/ and would fail if a required parameter is missing. This would eliminate the need for new strings like 'sibling_guest_id' (or as Cody calls it monopolizing strings...) Following quick patch on top of the patchset shows the changes: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c index 73d5bfc..a82bc64 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ #include "hv-24x7-catalog.h" #include "hv-common.h" + +#if 0 static const char *domain_to_index_string(unsigned domain) { switch (domain) { @@ -40,6 +42,7 @@ static const char *domain_to_index_string(unsigned domain) return "UNKNOWN_DOMAIN_INDEX_STRING"; } } +#endif static const char *event_domain_suffix(unsigned domain) { @@ -114,7 +117,8 @@ static bool catalog_entry_domain_is_valid(unsigned domain) /* u3 0-6, one of HV_24X7_PERF_DOMAIN */ EVENT_DEFINE_RANGE_FORMAT(domain, config, 0, 3); /* u16 */ -EVENT_DEFINE_RANGE_FORMAT(starting_index, config, 16, 31); +EVENT_DEFINE_RANGE_FORMAT(core, config, 16, 31); +EVENT_DEFINE_RANGE_FORMAT(vcpu, config, 16, 31); /* u32, see "data_offset" */ EVENT_DEFINE_RANGE_FORMAT(offset, config, 32, 63); /* u16 */ @@ -127,7 +131,8 @@ EVENT_DEFINE_RANGE(reserved3, config2, 0, 63); static struct attribute *format_attrs[] = { &format_attr_domain.attr, &format_attr_offset.attr, - &format_attr_starting_index.attr, + &format_attr_core.attr, + &format_attr_vcpu.attr, &format_attr_lpar.attr, NULL, }; @@ -280,19 +285,23 @@ static unsigned core_domains[] = { static char *event_fmt(struct hv_24x7_event_data *event, unsigned domain) { + const char *sindex; const char *lpar; - if (is_physical_domain(domain)) + if (is_physical_domain(domain)) { lpar = "0x0"; - else - lpar = "$sibling_guest_id"; + sindex = "core"; + } else { + lpar = "?"; + sindex = "vcpu"; + } return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, - "domain=0x%x,offset=0x%x,starting_index=%s,lpar=%s", + "domain=0x%x,offset=0x%x,%s=?,lpar=%s", domain, be16_to_cpu(event->event_counter_offs) + be16_to_cpu(event->event_group_record_offs), - domain_to_index_string(domain), + sindex, lpar); } @@ -1061,9 +1070,17 @@ out: static unsigned long event_24x7_request(struct perf_event *event, u64 *res, bool success_expected) { + u16 idx; + unsigned domain = event_get_domain(event); + + if (is_physical_domain(domain)) + idx = event_get_core(event); + else + idx = event_get_vcpu(event); + return single_24x7_request(event_get_domain(event), event_get_offset(event), - event_get_starting_index(event), + idx, event_get_lpar(event), res, success_expected); diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c index f8674c1..d208fef 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, struct perf_pmu *pmu, list_for_each_entry(term, &alias->terms, list) if (term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR) used += snprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used), - ",%s=$%s", term->config, + ",%s=%s", term->config, term->val.str); if (sub_non_neg(len, used) > 0) { ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events 2014-12-07 7:37 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-08 10:59 ` Jiri Olsa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jiri Olsa @ 2014-12-08 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Michael Ellerman, peterz, linux-kernel, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, dev, Paul Mackerras, linuxppc-dev On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 11:37:24PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > Jiri Olsa [jolsa@redhat.com] wrote: > > | anyway we could assign directly to the param term name as you do, > | but I think we just need to mark the term as parametrized, like: > | > | in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/pmu/events/event_name you have: > | param2=?,bar=1,param1=? > > I like the idea of just using a single ? for required parameters, but > the problem I had with this approach can be seen with these two sysfs > entries: > > $ cat HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__PHYS_CORE > domain=0x2,offset=0xe0,starting_index=core,lpar=0x0 > > $ cat HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__VCPU_HOME_CORE > domain=0x3,offset=0xe0,starting_index=vcpu,lpar=sibling_guest_id > > The parameter 'starting_index' refers to a core in one event and vcpu in > another event. We were trying to give a hint as to what it refers to. > > Given that, 'starting_index' is not very intuitive, how about discarding > starting_index and replacing with what it really means for the event and, > use a simple '?' to indicate required parameter). > > $ cat HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__PHYS_CORE > domain=0x2,offset=0xe0,core=?,lpar=0x0 > > $ cat HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__VCPU_HOME_CORE > domain=0x3,offset=0xe0,vcpu=?,lpar=? > > perf list shows these as: > > hv_24x7/HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__PHYS_CORE,core=?/ > hv_24x7/HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__VCPU_HOME_CHIP,vcpu=?,lpar=?/ > > command line would be > > -e hv_24x7/HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__PHYS_CORE,core=2/ > > or > > -e hv_24x7/HPM_0THRD_NON_IDLE_CCYC__VCPU_HOME_CHIP,vcpu=2,lpar=7/ > > and would fail if a required parameter is missing. that sounds good to me jirka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/4] tools/perf: extend format_alias() to include event parameters 2014-12-03 2:09 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support for parametrized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] perf Documentation: add " Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] tools/perf: Document parameterized and symbolic events Sukadev Bhattiprolu 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa, Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras Cc: peterz, linuxppc-dev, dev, linux-kernel From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> This causes `perf list pmu` to show parameters for parameterized events like: pmu/event_name,param1=$param1,param2=$param2/ [Kernel PMU event] Example: hv_24x7/HPM_TLBIE__PHYS_CORE,starting_index=$core/ [Kernel PMU event] Changelog[v5] [Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra] Use '$' to prefix parameterized events. Changelog[v4] [Jiri Olsa] If the parameter for an event in sysfs is 'param=val', have perf-list show the event as 'param=?' rather than 'val=?'. CC: Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com> CC: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c index cb516dd..f8674c1 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c @@ -810,10 +810,35 @@ void perf_pmu__set_format(unsigned long *bits, long from, long to) set_bit(b, bits); } +static int sub_non_neg(int a, int b) +{ + if (b > a) + return 0; + return a - b; +} + static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, struct perf_pmu *pmu, struct perf_pmu_alias *alias) { - snprintf(buf, len, "%s/%s/", pmu->name, alias->name); + struct parse_events_term *term; + int used = snprintf(buf, len, "%s/%s", pmu->name, alias->name); + + list_for_each_entry(term, &alias->terms, list) + if (term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR) + used += snprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used), + ",%s=$%s", term->config, + term->val.str); + + if (sub_non_neg(len, used) > 0) { + buf[used] = '/'; + used++; + } + if (sub_non_neg(len, used) > 0) { + buf[used] = '\0'; + used++; + } else + buf[len - 1] = '\0'; + return buf; } -- 1.8.3.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 3/4] perf Documentation: add event parameters 2014-12-03 2:09 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support for parametrized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] tools/perf: extend format_alias() to include event parameters Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] tools/perf: Document parameterized and symbolic events Sukadev Bhattiprolu 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa, Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras Cc: peterz, linuxppc-dev, dev, linux-kernel From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Event parameters are a basic way for partial events to be specified in sysfs with per-event names given to the fields that need to be filled in when using a particular event. It is intended for supporting cases where the single 'cpu' parameter is insufficient. For example, POWER 8 has events for physical sockets/cores/cpus that are accessible from with virtual machines. To keep using the single 'cpu' parameter we'd need to perform a mapping between Linux's cpus and the physical machine's cpus (in this case Linux is running under a hypervisor). This isn't possible because bindings between our cpus and physical cpus may not be fixed, and we probably won't have a "cpu" on each physical cpu. CC: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com> CC: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events index 20979f8..f584b16 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events @@ -52,12 +52,18 @@ Description: Per-pmu performance monitoring events specific to the running syste event=0x2abc event=0x423,inv,cmask=0x3 domain=0x1,offset=0x8,starting_index=0xffff + domain=0x1,offset=0x8,starting_index=$phys_cpu Each of the assignments indicates a value to be assigned to a particular set of bits (as defined by the format file corresponding to the <term>) in the perf_event structure passed to the perf_open syscall. + In the case of the last example, a value replacing "$phys_cpu" + would need to be provided by the user selecting the particular + event. This is referred to as "event parameterization". All + non-numerical values indicate an event parameter. + What: /sys/bus/event_source/devices/<pmu>/events/<event>.unit Date: 2014/02/24 Contact: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> -- 1.8.3.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 4/4] tools/perf: Document parameterized and symbolic events 2014-12-03 2:09 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support for parametrized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] perf Documentation: add " Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu @ 2014-12-03 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa, Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras Cc: peterz, linuxppc-dev, dev, linux-kernel From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Changelog[v6]: - [Sukadev Bhattiprolu]: Update documentation of perf-list and perf-record; Added documentation for perf-stat. CC: Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com> CC: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 12 ++++++++++++ tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt index cbb4f74..8e9a1121 100644 --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt @@ -89,6 +89,19 @@ raw encoding of 0x1A8 can be used: You should refer to the processor specific documentation for getting these details. Some of them are referenced in the SEE ALSO section below. +PARAMETERIZED EVENTS +-------------------- + +Some pmu events listed by 'perf-list' will be displayed with '$x' in them. For +example: + + hv_gpci/dtbp_ptitc,starting_index=$core/ + +This means that when provided as an event, a value for '$core' must +also be supplied. For example: + + perf stat -C 0 -e 'hv_gpci/dtbp_ptitc,starting_index=0x2/' ... + OPTIONS ------- diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt index af9a54e..acdcf3b 100644 --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt @@ -33,6 +33,18 @@ OPTIONS - a raw PMU event (eventsel+umask) in the form of rNNN where NNN is a hexadecimal event descriptor. + - a symbolically formed PMU event like 'pmu/param1=0x3,param2/' where + 'param1', 'param2', etc are defined as formats for the PMU in + /sys/bus/event_sources/devices/<pmu>/format/*. + + - a symbolically formed event like 'pmu/config=M,config1=N,config3=K/' + + where M, N, K are numbers (in decimal, hex, octal format). Acceptable + values for each of 'config', 'config1' and 'config2' are defined by + corresponding entries in /sys/bus/event_sources/devices/<pmu>/format/* + param1 and param2 are defined as formats for the PMU in: + /sys/bus/event_sources/devices/<pmu>/format/* + - a hardware breakpoint event in the form of '\mem:addr[:access]' where addr is the address in memory you want to break in. Access is the memory access type (read, write, execute) it can diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt index 29ee857..04e150d 100644 --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt @@ -25,10 +25,22 @@ OPTIONS -e:: --event=:: - Select the PMU event. Selection can be a symbolic event name - (use 'perf list' to list all events) or a raw PMU - event (eventsel+umask) in the form of rNNN where NNN is a - hexadecimal event descriptor. + Select the PMU event. Selection can be: + + - a symbolic event name (use 'perf list' to list all events) + + - a raw PMU event (eventsel+umask) in the form of rNNN where NNN is a + hexadecimal event descriptor. + + - a symbolically formed event like 'pmu/param1=0x3,param2/' where + param1 and param2 are defined as formats for the PMU in + /sys/bus/event_sources/devices/<pmu>/format/* + + - a symbolically formed event like 'pmu/config=M,config1=N,config2=K/' + where M, N, K are numbers (in decimal, hex, octal format). + Acceptable values for each of 'config', 'config1' and 'config2' + parameters are defined by corresponding entries in + /sys/bus/event_sources/devices/<pmu>/format/* -i:: --no-inherit:: -- 1.8.3.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-08 11:00 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-12-03 2:09 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support for parametrized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] tools/perf: support parsing parameterized events Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-04 12:44 ` Jiri Olsa 2014-12-05 23:05 ` Cody P Schafer 2014-12-06 12:20 ` Jiri Olsa 2014-12-07 7:37 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-08 10:59 ` Jiri Olsa 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] tools/perf: extend format_alias() to include event parameters Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] perf Documentation: add " Sukadev Bhattiprolu 2014-12-03 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] tools/perf: Document parameterized and symbolic events Sukadev Bhattiprolu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).